Skip to content

update forc-call missing contract function to use fuels-rs sdk #7113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
zees-dev opened this issue Apr 24, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

update forc-call missing contract function to use fuels-rs sdk #7113

zees-dev opened this issue Apr 24, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
code quality forc-call Everything related to the `forc-call` plugin in `forc-client` package good first issue Good for newcomers team:tooling Tooling Team

Comments

@zees-dev
Copy link
Contributor

zees-dev commented Apr 24, 2025

The fuels-rs SDK can be used to now retrieve missing contracts for a forc-call query.

A public function was introduced in this PR: FuelLabs/fuels-rs#1628

  • find_ids_of_missing_contracts in the utils package

Related to #7110 (comment)

@zees-dev zees-dev self-assigned this Apr 24, 2025
@zees-dev zees-dev added good first issue Good for newcomers forc-call Everything related to the `forc-call` plugin in `forc-client` package team:tooling Tooling Team labels Apr 24, 2025
JoshuaBatty added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2025
## Description

Using `fuels-rs` SDK to retrieve missing contracts for a forc-call
query.

This function/improvement was introduced in the `fuels-rs` sdk here:
FuelLabs/fuels-rs#1628

Addresses: #7113

## Checklist

- [x] I have linked to any relevant issues.
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the
reference, and the Sway book).
- [ ] If my change requires substantial documentation changes, I have
[requested support from the DevRel
team](https://github.com/FuelLabs/devrel-requests/issues/new/choose)
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works.
- [ ] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary
`Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant.
- [ ] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs
Code Review
Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md).
- [ ] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.

Co-authored-by: z <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joshua Batty <[email protected]>
@zees-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

addressed: #7115

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code quality forc-call Everything related to the `forc-call` plugin in `forc-client` package good first issue Good for newcomers team:tooling Tooling Team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant