Skip to content

Question related report field in metadata #291

Open
@FarbodTavakoli

Description

@FarbodTavakoli

@john-b-yang

I am reflecting on the issue created on May 13 #221 . I would appreciate it if you could provide more clarification.

For an industry research team, is the following tech report acceptable? tech report. The report was initially written by the first two authors and further enhanced by Claude Sonnet 4.

If it is not acceptable, what is it missing exactly? We can put the report in a more formal format in terms of writing and publish it in a blog post on either the AT&T or RelationalAI websites if needed. I even spoke with our partners at Nvidia about their submission. The only part missing in our report is a few diagrams and plots. Should we add more diagrams?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions