Skip to content

when replying, DeltaChat does not set the IMAP tag \Answered #6622

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
gerryfrancis opened this issue Mar 7, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

when replying, DeltaChat does not set the IMAP tag \Answered #6622

gerryfrancis opened this issue Mar 7, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@gerryfrancis
Copy link
Collaborator

Expected behavior:

When replying to an email, the replied message gets the IMAP flag \Answered. Then, many clients have a specific icon in the UI to notify the user about it. This is very useful for tracking unreplied emails.

Actual behavior:

When replying to an email, no IMAP flag is set.
Steps to reproduce the problem:

  • Reply to an email x.
  • List IMAP flags for x

Originally reported by @monperrus, see deltachat/deltachat-android#3647 .

@hpk42
Copy link
Contributor

hpk42 commented Mar 7, 2025 via email

@link2xt
Copy link
Collaborator

link2xt commented Mar 16, 2025

We use \Seen flag in cleartext, but should not add more cleartext flags, especially if Delta Chat is not going to read it.

This \Answered flag is part of IMAP4rev1 so should be supported by all servers.

On encrypted mails it does not make sense to set it. Can be set on plaintext mails when they are explicitly quoted as a best effort, but it is definitely a feature request rather than a bug.

@link2xt link2xt changed the title when replying, DeltaChat does not set the IMAP tag \replied when replying, DeltaChat does not set the IMAP tag \Answered Mar 16, 2025
@monperrus
Copy link

On encrypted mails it does not make sense to set it

agree.

Can be set on plaintext mails

would be awesome for non-encrypted email workflows (incl. mine)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants