find_min_global don't find the best minimum #3051
Julien-Livet
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 3 comments
-
10ms isn't very long. This isn't a super fast solver. Does it work if you let it run a lot longer? This solver isn't what I would recommend if speed is what you need. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It is the same result with 1s. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Usually, when I am unsure of the run time, I use the overload with auto const result{dlib::find_min_global(f, bound1, bound2, dlib::max_function_calls(10000))}; But I am still unable to find the result you want to find, even with 10000 calls. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I write a function that I want to find the minimum value. It works for the first iteration but the second, find_min_global found a min of 2.38356e-14 with p,q,lnbetan = (117,9,4.10725) whereas the best mininum is 2.30677e-14 with p,q,lnbetan = (103, 7, 3.94938993840887).
Is there some parameter of find_min_global to tune to solve this problem?
Here is the code.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions