You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I was reading the AutoGen documentation, which suggests that the code writer and code executor agents should be separate. I wanted to ask — is it considered bad to combine both roles into a single agent?
For example, I have a processor that generates a lot of preprocessing code and also needs to execute that code. Combining both roles in one agent reduces the overhead of managing conversations, especially since I plan to use a group chat layer on top of this. I'm just not sure if this approach aligns with best practices.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, I was reading the AutoGen documentation, which suggests that the code writer and code executor agents should be separate. I wanted to ask — is it considered bad to combine both roles into a single agent?
For example, I have a processor that generates a lot of preprocessing code and also needs to execute that code. Combining both roles in one agent reduces the overhead of managing conversations, especially since I plan to use a group chat layer on top of this. I'm just not sure if this approach aligns with best practices.
Would appreciate your thoughts — thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions