Closed
Description
Hi, I'm curious how you see CodeAct architectures fitting into MCP?
Right now LLMs are using tools as black boxes through API supported tool-use via writing JSON tool calls.
If CodeAct becomes more performant and we transition to importing code modules as tools and executing them in sandboxes, a standard will still be required for defining these modules in the best way for LLMs, and we'll also need a way to serve access to these code module tools.
Curious if there are any thoughts that can be shared around this? CodeAct has seen some recent buzz with the introduction of Manus and other chat agents which use it.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels