last minute changes

Author: di

STAT601/presentation.tex

@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
         \item This also makes the ``slope'' of each line arbitrary as well;
         \item Fails to show correlation between spending and life expectancy;
         \item No reason for discrete line widths, or width increments of four;
+        \item Doesn't explain why some OECD countries are missing;
         \item Is it really necessary to tell the viewer which direction is ``above'' average and which is ``below''?
     \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
@@ -61,6 +62,7 @@
     \frametitle{Solution:}
     \begin{itemize}
         \item Find the original data;
+        \item Use the most up-to-date, complete year (thus omitting countries with insufficient data);
         \item Use a scatter plot instead;
         \item Make the axes the average life expectancy and cost of healthcare;
         \item Make the size of the point correspond to the average number of doctor visits;
@@ -79,11 +81,11 @@
         \item A correlation between average life expectancy and cost of healthcare is shown;
         \item Position of individual country relative to the average life expectancy and cost of healthcare is clear;
         \item The average number of doctor consultations per country is no longer discrete;
+        \item Explains why some countries are missing;
         \item The United States is very clearly an outlier.
     \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
-
 \begin{frame}
     \frametitle{Sources:}
     \begin{itemize}