Re: [Astlinux-devel] Issues building tags/0.6?

Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> I've updated a couple of hours ago, and building from scratch I see:
>
> ...
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/philipp/0.6/build_i586/linux-2.6.20.21-astlinux'
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
>   HOSTCC  scripts/genksyms/genksyms.o
>   SHIPPED scripts/genksyms/lex.c
>   SHIPPED scripts/genksyms/parse.h
>   SHIPPED scripts/genksyms/keywords.c
>   CC      arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s
>   SHIPPED scripts/genksyms/parse.c
>   HOSTCC  scripts/genksyms/lex.o
> scripts/genksyms/lex.c:1230: warning: ‘input’ defined but not used
>   HOSTCC  scripts/genksyms/parse.o
>   HOSTLD  scripts/genksyms/genksyms
>   GEN     include/asm-i386/asm-offsets.h
>   CC      scripts/mod/empty.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
>   HOSTCC  scripts/kallsyms
>   MKELF   scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/file2alias.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/modpost.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/mod/sumversion.o
> scripts/mod/sumversion.c: In function ‘get_src_version’:
> scripts/mod/sumversion.c:384: error: ‘PATH_MAX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> scripts/mod/sumversion.c:384: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> scripts/mod/sumversion.c:384: error: for each function it appears in.)
> scripts/mod/sumversion.c:384: warning: unused variable ‘filelist’
> make[3]: *** [scripts/mod/sumversion.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [scripts/mod] Error 2
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [scripts] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/philipp/0.6/build_i586/linux-2.6.20.21-astlinux'
> make: *** [/home/philipp/0.6/build_i586/linux-2.6.20.21-astlinux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage] Error 2
>
>
> This is on an FC9-x86_64 platform.
>
> Anyone else seeing this?
>
> -Philip
>   
Philip,

Yes I have seen this same issue while building the 0.6 branch.  I 
*temporarily* fixed it by *manually* adding "#include <limits.h>" to the 
headers section of the scripts/mod/sumversion.c linux source file.  This 
should probably get turned into a patch.

-Steve