Re: [Astlinux-devel] [Astlinux-commits] SF.net SVN: astlinux:[3327] branches/0.7

Do you have a specific commit in mind?  All of the libusb-1.0 related 
changes were required to go.  We're not using libusb-1.0.  If there are 
changes which contribute positively towards a stable release, I'd be all 
ears for knowing which lines should go back in.

Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> Ok, so that accounts for one line... What about all of the rest of the
> changes that were needlessly backed out?
> 
> 
> On 09/25/2009 02:01 PM, Darrick Hartman wrote:
>> Philip,
>>
>> usbutils has been built this way (without using zlib) for a very long 
>> time (all of 0.6 for sure, probably longer).  If we don't link against 
>> zlib, the .gz file is never created.  Granted, in 0.6 with did not 
>> explicitly state --without-zlib, but that's because the order of 
>> compilation was fixed in trunk.
>>
>> pciutils works the same way.  All I know is if usbutils and pciutils are 
>> linked against zlib, that both lspci and lsusb take about 30-40 seconds 
>> on more limited hardware.
>>
>>
>>
>> Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>>   
>>> You know what? You want to gratuitously diverge the branch from trunk,
>>> that's your call.
>>>
>>> I don't recommend it.
>>>
>>> Deleting the usb.ids.gz file saves room in the ramfs, which as you
>>> remember you said yesterday was getting crowded...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/25/2009 01:20 PM, Darrick Hartman wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Philip,
>>>>
>>>> What items won't build properly with the way 0.7 is right now?  Neither 
>>>> Lonnie or I are seeing any breakage with the current status.
>>>>
>>>> What does compiling against zlib get us if we're not using the generated 
>>>> file?  My understanding is that not linking against zlib or deleting the 
>>>> usb.ids.gz file results in the same outcome.  If that's not correct, 
>>>> please clarify.
>>>>
>>>> Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>>> So, can you make the necessary reversions please?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Philip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/24/2009 11:42 AM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>>>> Since you didn't ask before making the changes, I figured you had that
>>>>>> all worked out...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Guess not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All you *really* needed to do, was switch "libusb-compat" back to
>>>>>> "libusb" as a dependency, change "libusb-1.0" into "libusb" (or
>>>>>> "-lusb-1.0" into "-lusb") wherever you saw that as a linker flag,
>>>>>> disable BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUSB-COMPAT, and revert the version # and URL in
>>>>>> package/libusb/libusb.mk (maybe also the setting for LIBUSB_CAT).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That was it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patch to libusb-config for instance is not needed, and should have
>>>>>> been left out. And the extra flags being passed into Make, the shuffling
>>>>>> of files, etc. was totally unnecessary and just confuses the issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patch to usbutils's makefile is correct, and fixes a bug... as well
>>>>>> as being benign with earlier versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the fix leaving the linkage with zlib, but removing the usb.ids.gz
>>>>>> file is the correct one: what install a file you're unequipped to read?
>>>>>> That just wastes space...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/24/2009 05:11 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>> Philip,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I reverted usb to trunk-3312 in 0.7.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The resulting 0.7 build appears to work properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have any specific cleanups that were a part of your usb-compat  
>>>>>>> changes I'm all ears.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lonnie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> Some of what you're backing out is actually needed cleanup to broken
>>>>>>>> makefiles.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/23/2009 05:16 PM, abe...@us... wrote:
>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>> Revision: 3327
>>>>>>>>>          http://astlinux.svn.sourceforge.net/astlinux/?rev=3327&view=rev
>>>>>>>>> Author:   abelbeck
>>>>>>>>> Date:     2009-09-24 00:16:45 +0000 (Thu, 24 Sep 2009)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Log Message:
>>>>>>>>> -----------
>>>>>>>>> Remove libusb-compat from 0.7 branch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Modified Paths:
>>>>>>>>> --------------
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/astlinux.config
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/Config.in
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/apcupsd/apcupsd.mk
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/dahdi-linux/dahdi-linux.mk
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/dahdi-tools/dahdi-tools.mk
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/lcdproc/lcdproc.mk
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/libftdi/libftdi.mk
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/libusb/libusb.mk
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/usbutils/usbutils.mk
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/zaptel/zaptel.mk
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Added Paths:
>>>>>>>>> -----------
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/libusb/libusb-config
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Removed Paths:
>>>>>>>>> -------------
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/libusb-compat/
>>>>>>>>>    branches/0.7/package/usbutils/usbutils-makefile.patch
>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>                 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-devel mailing list
> Ast...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-devel
> 
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....