Menu
▾
▴
#1 munch and hunspell v unmunch
Hi,
You said that unmunch lacks some of the capabilities of
hunspell. What is that status with munch? We may have
to compile larger lexica, and would obviously need
munch for that.
And another question: if unmunch cannot generate all
strings from the lexicon, can hunspell find all
suggestions (since that involves the same procedure)?
Thanks,
Frederik
Logged In: YES
user_id=726595
Unmunch doesn't handle Unicode in affix rule conditions,
double suffix splitting and special Hunspell flags (plus
doesn't generate compounds).
I think, you can make a poor man's unmunch with the
following trick:
[P x D x S x S] | hunspell -l
[P x D X S x S] is the all prefix x dic x suffix x suffix
combinations. Use P x D x S, but that will be also too time
consuming for some dictionaries.
Sorry for the late answer.
Best regards,
Laci
Maybe this is not a solution but a follow-up with the same problem
Does HUNSPELL itself have a way to generate all possible words given the dictionary and the affix files just like UNMUNCH?
I am using HUNSPELL and my interest is actually the corpus generated itself and not the rules
And what exactly is the use of of the MUNCH command?