Michal Molhanec

Hi Mike :) It nice to see interest in the good old devpaks.org :) However I don't see much value in that :) I mean, in the last years of existence there were few (if any) devpak updates per year. In fact there were much more spam posts than valid devpak updates. That also means that most of them become completely obsolete. And another problem was that devpaks were never stored at devpaks.org, so unless they were stored e.g. here at SourceForge they had the tendency to disappear. And a devpak is simply...

I would just use some online refernce like http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/numeri...

Hello, thanks for your devpak. It looks OK to me. Devpak should be visible in WebUpdate...

Hello, this version is practically Abandoned, try Orwell Dev-C++: http://orwelldevcpp.blogspot.com/...

Thanks! That was fast!

Hello, it's nice to see new devpaks. My comments: The link to the devpak on your...

Template files, Catagory to Category change