Views: 8178
Submissions: 25
Favs: 464
Writer | Registered: June 30, 2013 08:27:47 PM
Not Available...
Recently Watched
Stats
Comments Earned: 49
Comments Made: 20
Journals: 5
Comments Made: 20
Journals: 5
Recent Journal
Chris Clarifies (G)
8 years ago
Hey guys, this is Chris. For those of you who know my from Inkbunny, yes, I still have this account. Leo gave it to me. I literally have everything I need to run this account.
It seems that since Leo returned to this place and started posting some of my artwork, he's received a few questions... and complaints... and a death threat or two. So since the complaints come from stuff I'm responsible for, I'll give the information you need.
Okay, now first off, I freely acknowledge I like the unclothed human form. It's quite beautiful in many regards. I freely admit to finding children adorable in many ways. BUT! I in no way find children sexually attractive. I don't like seeing kids being sexualized, and I ESPECIALLY hate drawn child porn; it's quite disgusting.
So, about the artwork. Well, my art is designed to highlight a few interesting double standards, one I've seen just in the comments made on this account. It seems that nudity of children is acceptable... so long as the kid in question is a boy. If it's a girl, the person who created the picture is automatically assumed to be a pedophile. And what logic do they have? Usually none. Okay, plenty of people have said that the female body is "inherently sexual", and to that I say... no. Because you can't quantify nurture by conflating it with nature.
The point is, my pictures are not intended as sexual pictures AT ALL. Some of them are intended as artist reference, some are intended for humor, and some to make a point about sociology. If you're uncomfortable about seeing girls in these situations, situations boys have been in for a long time, then that should say something more about the SITUATION, and not the VICTIM.
It seems to me the only train of logic people have is a vastly simplified one:
-The girl is naked
-It is porn
-No other reason exists
-Evidence to the contrary is denial
-SHUT UP, SHUT UP, LALALA CAN'T HEAR YOU
Good grief, this is why I'm spending more of my money on MechWarrior. I don't have to waste time making the same arguments I make time and time again!
It seems that since Leo returned to this place and started posting some of my artwork, he's received a few questions... and complaints... and a death threat or two. So since the complaints come from stuff I'm responsible for, I'll give the information you need.
Okay, now first off, I freely acknowledge I like the unclothed human form. It's quite beautiful in many regards. I freely admit to finding children adorable in many ways. BUT! I in no way find children sexually attractive. I don't like seeing kids being sexualized, and I ESPECIALLY hate drawn child porn; it's quite disgusting.
So, about the artwork. Well, my art is designed to highlight a few interesting double standards, one I've seen just in the comments made on this account. It seems that nudity of children is acceptable... so long as the kid in question is a boy. If it's a girl, the person who created the picture is automatically assumed to be a pedophile. And what logic do they have? Usually none. Okay, plenty of people have said that the female body is "inherently sexual", and to that I say... no. Because you can't quantify nurture by conflating it with nature.
The point is, my pictures are not intended as sexual pictures AT ALL. Some of them are intended as artist reference, some are intended for humor, and some to make a point about sociology. If you're uncomfortable about seeing girls in these situations, situations boys have been in for a long time, then that should say something more about the SITUATION, and not the VICTIM.
It seems to me the only train of logic people have is a vastly simplified one:
-The girl is naked
-It is porn
-No other reason exists
-Evidence to the contrary is denial
-SHUT UP, SHUT UP, LALALA CAN'T HEAR YOU
Good grief, this is why I'm spending more of my money on MechWarrior. I don't have to waste time making the same arguments I make time and time again!
User Profile
Accepting Trades
No Accepting Commissions
No Character Species
Namekian
Favorite Artists
Akira Toriyama
FA+
...and I'm not talking about the girls.