pgsql-hackers since 2008-07-20 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

July 20, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera 00:21
pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 03:07
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 04:47
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane 05:36
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands Bruce Momjian 06:08
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance 📎 Simon Riggs 06:37
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Peter Eisentraut 07:50
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin Tom Lane 13:48
Re: temp table problem 📎 Heikki Linnakangas 15:27
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 15:42
Re: temp table problem Tom Lane 16:04
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tom Lane 16:22
CommitFest dragging? Josh Berkus 17:17
Re: CommitFest dragging? Joshua D. Drake 17:22
Re: pg_dump lock timeout Tom Lane 18:50
Re: CommitFest dragging? Tom Lane 19:05
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 21:43
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 21:59
Re: CommitFest dragging? Andrew Chernow 22:20
Re: CommitFest dragging? Josh Berkus 22:38
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii 23:19

July 21, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 David Fetter 00:00
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717 Tatsuo Ishii 01:13
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Radek Strnad 01:15
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 01:18
Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql? laser 01:39
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance daveg 01:49
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 01:58
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 03:34
Re: TODO item: Have psql show current values for a sequence Tom Lane 05:38
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Pavan Deolasee 06:06
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 06:11
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 06:17
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 06:47
Re: pg_dump lock timeout daveg 07:21
Re: pg_dump lock timeout Tom Lane 07:43
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 08:40
Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas 08:53
overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 11:08
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the 📎 Markus Wanner 11:33
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 11:46
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 11:54
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 11:56
Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark 13:46
WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 14:04
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Markus Wanner 14:14
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Tatsuo Ishii 14:22
Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 14:29
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane 14:31
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721 Pavel Stehule 14:41
Re: overlaps performance Tom Lane 14:44
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches chris 14:45
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Markus Wanner 14:55
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Tom Lane 15:02
Re: overlaps performance Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 15:09
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Andrew Dunstan 15:19
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas 15:23
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the Tom Lane 15:27
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 15:38
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain 16:07
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Heikki Linnakangas 16:14
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit Cédric Villemain 16:50
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler 18:55
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 19:26
Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 19:43
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) 📎 Robert Lor 19:47
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Berkus 19:53
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan 19:59
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 20:07
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Simon Riggs 20:08
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:14
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Marc Munro 20:17
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:17
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 20:18
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan 20:19
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen 20:21
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Sullivan 20:28
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Tom Lane 20:33
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:37
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:38
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 20:38
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Cramer 20:55
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Decibel! 20:58
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Stephen Frost 21:00
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Gurjeet Singh 21:11
Re: typedefs for indent Andrew Dunstan 21:27
Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 21:50
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Andrew Sullivan 22:13
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Alvaro Herrera 22:15
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Tom Lane 23:19
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11 Tom Lane 23:38
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane 23:59

July 22, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 01:29
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 01:32
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 01:39
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Tom Lane 02:19
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 02:51
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Owen Hartnett 03:53
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Matthew T. O'Connor 04:31
Re: pg_dump lock timeout 📎 daveg 05:57
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Martijn van Oosterhout 06:33
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance Simon Riggs 06:35
Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner 08:04
Re: overlaps performance Gregory Stark 09:15
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut 09:48
pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 10:57
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE Jonah H. Harris 11:28
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 12:21
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 12:43
Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O Simon Riggs 12:44
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark 13:39
shared_buffers and shmmax dx k9 13:39
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dave Page 13:47
Re: shared_buffers and shmmax Valentin Bogdanov 14:08
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala 14:32
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane 14:34
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Andrew Sullivan 14:39
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 14:42
Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax Tom Lane 14:45
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen 14:50
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 14:53
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Christopher Browne 14:54
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane 14:55
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Gregory Stark 15:00
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Zdenek Kotala 15:25
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Tom Lane 15:25
Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs 15:35
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen 15:47
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Simon Riggs 15:58
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane 16:03
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 16:08
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Dimitri Fontaine 16:21
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Andrew Dunstan 16:25
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Joshua D. Drake 16:26
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala 16:36
Re: Plans for 8.4 Markus Wanner 16:37
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Markus Wanner 16:59
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1) Zdenek Kotala 17:03
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Alvaro Herrera 17:15
Slony-I playing with system catalog chris 17:16
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev 17:22
Re: Plans for 8.4 David E. Wheeler 17:23
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane 17:26
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Tom Lane 17:35
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane 17:50
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output Simon Riggs 18:00
Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs 18:13
Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs 18:23
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev 18:24
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Shane Ambler 18:34
Re: phrase search Teodor Sigaev 18:42
Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs 18:56
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Tom Lane 19:01
Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax Francisco Reyes 19:30
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Simon Riggs 19:51
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler 20:33
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches Tom Lane 20:49
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4 David E. Wheeler 20:54
Re: Plans for 8.4 Tom Lane 20:54
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Josh Berkus 21:06
Re: Plans for 8.4 Markus Wanner 21:08
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 21:24
Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Decibel! 21:32
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner 21:35
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 21:36
Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner 21:43
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake 21:44
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 21:54
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake 22:02
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Simon Riggs 22:15
Re: Plans for 8.4 Simon Riggs 22:18
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Marko Kreen 22:39
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Simon Riggs 23:08
Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Decibel! 23:09

July 23, 2008

Thread Author Time
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Martin Zaun 00:19
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Jens-Wolfhard Schicke 00:49
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Xiao Meng 02:57
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Xiao Meng 02:57
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Devrim GÜNDÜZ 03:26
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 03:29
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Dann Corbit 03:36
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake 03:47
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane 04:01
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Joshua D. Drake 04:47
Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization Markus Wanner 05:42
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication Markus Wanner 06:08
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving Simon Riggs 07:07
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs 07:09
Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner 07:17
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Alexey Klyukin 09:41
Re: [patch] plproxy v2 Marko Kreen 09:48
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen 09:56
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner 10:31
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Simon Riggs 10:59
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Teodor Sigaev 11:36
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline Oleg Bartunov 11:44
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements Teodor Sigaev 13:39
WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 📎 Tatsuo Ishii 13:54
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Peter Eisentraut 14:14
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 Tom Lane 14:36

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31