pgsql-hackers since 2012-02-21 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Feb. 21, 2012

Thread Author Time
Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 00:10
Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Peter Geoghegan 01:19
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Tom Lane 01:32
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Adrian Klaver 01:37
Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane 01:48
Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Tom Lane 01:50
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 01:57
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Tom Lane 02:37
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 02:46
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Rob Sargentg 03:04
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 03:25
Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost Fujii Masao 03:59
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Tom Lane 04:01
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Bruce Momjian 04:21
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Tom Lane 04:32
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 04:35
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 04:47
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 04:50
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Tom Lane 05:03
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 05:11
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 05:40
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Tom Lane 06:32
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Maxim Boguk 07:07
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Marko Kreen 07:41
Re: Access Error Details from PL/pgSQL aasat 08:41
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 09:42
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 09:55
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Marko Kreen 09:56
Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) Peter Geoghegan 10:03
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Noah Misch 10:07
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 10:13
Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Sandro Santilli 10:19
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Marko Kreen 10:44
Re: Access Error Details from PL/pgSQL Pavel Stehule 10:48
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 11:15
Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Fujii Masao 11:19
Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server 📎 Etsuro Fujita 11:25
VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Pavel Stehule 14:00
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Simon Riggs 14:48
Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Tom Lane 15:21
Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays Erik Rijkers 15:22
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage 📎 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 15:27
Re: leakproof Peter Eisentraut 15:40
Re: leakproof Tom Lane 15:52
Re: leakproof Merlin Moncure 16:02
Re: [Bug fix] postmaster always crashes on a debug version of Windows Magnus Hagander 16:16
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Correctly initialise shared recoveryLastRecPtr in recovery. Fujii Masao 16:46
Re: leakproof Jeff Janes 16:54
Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c Peter Eisentraut 17:05
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Correctly initialise shared recoveryLastRecPtr in recovery. Simon Riggs 17:16
Review: alternate psql file locations David E. Wheeler 17:27
Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c Jan Urbański 17:28
Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Sandro Santilli 17:42
Re: Unfamous 'could not read block ... in file "...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes' again Tom Lane 18:21
Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays Peter Geoghegan 18:45
Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs Alvaro Herrera 18:54
Document hashtext() and Friends? David E. Wheeler 19:50
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? Tom Lane 20:01
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? Michael Glaesemann 20:11
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? Peter Geoghegan 20:12
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? David E. Wheeler 20:14
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? David E. Wheeler 20:22
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? Tom Lane 20:30
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? [email protected] 20:30
Re: Document hashtext() and Friends? Peter Geoghegan 20:50
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Correctly initialise shared recoveryLastRecPtr in recovery. Tom Lane 20:51
Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Dimitri Fontaine 21:34
Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost 📎 Dimitri Fontaine 21:44
Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs 📎 Alvaro Herrera 22:14
Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays 📎 Gabriele Bartolini 23:19
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Marko Kreen 23:36

Feb. 22, 2012

Thread Author Time
Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs Tom Lane 00:30
Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Fujii Masao 01:34
Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost Greg Smith 04:27
Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost Greg Smith 04:55
Re: Measuring relation free space Noah Misch 05:27
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Noah Misch 07:06
Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs 📎 Etsuro Fujita 08:37
Extensions default full version (was: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost) Dimitri Fontaine 10:07
Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION Sandro Santilli 10:16
pg_test_timing tool for EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead 📎 Greg Smith 11:53
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Simon Riggs 12:30
Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c 📎 Jan Urbański 12:37
temporal algebra and data type Peter Padua Krauss 12:50
Re: leakproof Robert Haas 12:57
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Robert Haas 12:59
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Nicolas Barbier 13:13
Re: temporal algebra and data type Euler Taveira de Oliveira 13:14
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas 13:32
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Robert Haas 13:33
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Simon Riggs 13:38
[PATCH] typo fix 📎 Sandro Santilli 13:47
Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points 📎 Alexander Korotkov 13:56
Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests 📎 Greg Smith 14:43
Re: leakproof Tom Lane 15:21
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Tom Lane 15:29
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? [email protected] 15:35
Re: leakproof Andrew Dunstan 15:56
Re: pg_basebackup -x stream from the standby gets stuck Magnus Hagander 16:02
Re: pg_test_timing tool for EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead Jay Levitt 16:10
Re: leakproof Kevin Grittner 16:14
WIP: proof of concept patch for fixing quantified regex backrefs 📎 Tom Lane 16:19
Re: leakproof Andrew Dunstan 16:26
Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests Ants Aasma 16:35
Re: pg_test_timing tool for EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead Greg Smith 16:44
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Noah Misch 17:00
Re: pg_test_timing tool for EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead Marti Raudsepp 17:25
Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq Greg Smith 17:26
Re: pg_test_timing tool for EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead Greg Smith 17:36
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Jeroen Vermeulen 17:54
determining a type oid from the name Andrew Dunstan 18:00
Re: determining a type oid from the name Thom Brown 18:28
Re: determining a type oid from the name Kevin Grittner 18:34
Re: determining a type oid from the name Thom Brown 18:36
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Pavel Stehule 18:36
Re: pg_test_timing tool for EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead Marti Raudsepp 18:45
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Kevin Grittner 18:57
Re: Publish checkpoint timing and sync files summary data to pg_stat_bgwriter 📎 Peter Geoghegan 19:11
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Pavel Stehule 19:12
Re: determining a type oid from the name Andrew Dunstan 19:14
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Simon Riggs 19:23
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian 19:38
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian 20:01
Re: determining a type oid from the name Tom Lane 20:20
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Alvaro Herrera 20:22
Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs Alvaro Herrera 20:32
Re: determining a type oid from the name Andrew Dunstan 20:32
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian 20:37
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Peter Eisentraut 20:50
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Peter Eisentraut 20:51
Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs Alvaro Herrera 21:07
Proposal: PL/pgPSM for 9.3 Pavel Stehule 21:19
Re: leakproof Marc Munro 21:29
Re: leakproof Andrew Dunstan 21:34
Re: determining a type oid from the name Dimitri Fontaine 21:46
Re: leakproof Robert Haas 21:58
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Robert Haas 22:02
swapcache-style cache? james 22:31
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Robert Haas 22:49
Re: WIP: proof of concept patch for fixing quantified regex backrefs Robert Haas 22:57
Option for pg_dump to dump tables in clustered index order 📎 Timothy Garnett 23:17
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 📎 Peter Geoghegan 23:17
Re: leakproof Tom Lane 23:30
Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC Jeff Davis 23:36
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian 23:38
Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian 23:40
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 David Fetter 23:51

Feb. 23, 2012

Thread Author Time
Commit a445cb92 not tested without OpenSSL support? Affan Salman 00:26
Re: leakproof Robert Haas 00:41
Re: [PATCH] typo fix Robert Haas 00:48
Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost Robert Haas 01:36
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 Robert Haas 01:39
Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport? Daniel Farina 04:17
Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server 📎 Shigeru Hanada 05:14
Re: Triggers with DO functionality Gianni Ciolli 07:15
Re: leakproof Christian Ullrich 08:17
Re: Commit a445cb92 not tested without OpenSSL support? Peter Eisentraut 08:23
Re: Triggers with DO functionality Thom Brown 08:26
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Simon Riggs 08:34
Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs Etsuro Fujita 08:37
Re: Triggers with DO functionality Gianni Ciolli 08:50
incompatible pointer types with newer zlib 📎 Peter Eisentraut 09:16
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs 09:18
pg_stat_statements normalization: re-review Daniel Farina 09:58
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage 📎 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 10:14
overriding current_timestamp Peter Eisentraut 11:08
Re: pg_stat_statements normalization: re-review Peter Geoghegan 11:09
Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label 📎 Kohei KaiGai 11:17
Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results 📎 Greg Smith 11:17
Re: Finer Extension dependencies Hitoshi Harada 11:35
Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Marko Kreen 12:34
Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results 📎 Simon Riggs 12:36
Re: pg_stat_statements normalization: re-review Peter Geoghegan 12:37
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Jeroen Vermeulen 13:08
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs 14:15
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs 14:21
Re: overriding current_timestamp Tom Lane 14:41
Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE? Robert Haas 14:44
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera 15:04
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs 15:12
Re: Option for pg_dump to dump tables in clustered index order Christopher Browne 15:14
Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib Tom Lane 15:17
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Tom Lane 15:28
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera 15:43
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera 15:49
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera 16:01
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Kevin Grittner 16:31
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera 17:45
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Greg Smith 17:48
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera 18:04
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Greg Smith 18:30
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs 18:41
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Kevin Grittner 18:44
Re: overriding current_timestamp David E. Wheeler 18:54
Re: overriding current_timestamp David E. Wheeler 18:55
Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c Daniele Varrazzo 20:35
Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results Greg Smith 20:44
Re: swapcache-style cache? Greg Smith 20:57
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Noah Misch 21:12
Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera 21:36

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29