Discussion of PostgreSQL's performance issues. Please see Guide to reporting problems and Slow Query Questions for some tips on how to write your performance question.
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Partial index creation always scans the entire table | Mike Sofen | 00:43 |
| Re: Partial index creation always scans the entire table | Justin Pryzby | 00:52 |
| Re: Partial index creation always scans the entire table | Tom Lane | 01:09 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Laurenz Albe | 09:53 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Lars Aksel Opsahl | 15:03 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Laurenz Albe | 16:35 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Pavel Stehule | 18:01 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Tom Lane | 18:23 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Pavel Stehule | 18:41 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Alvaro Herrera | 19:10 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Laurenz Albe | 17:27 |
| DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Nagaraj Raj | 17:46 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Tomas Vondra | 17:58 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Tom Lane | 18:07 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Nagaraj Raj | 18:10 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Stephen Frost | 18:33 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Merlin Moncure | 18:38 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Justin Pryzby | 18:40 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Merlin Moncure | 18:49 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Nagaraj Raj | 19:10 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Pavel Stehule | 23:46 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| tablespace to benefit from ssd ? | Nicolas PARIS | 04:42 |
| Re: tablespace to benefit from ssd ? | Sebastiaan Mannem | 08:02 |
| Re: tablespace to benefit from ssd ? | Laurenz Albe | 10:48 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Lars Aksel Opsahl | 10:49 |
| Re: tablespace to benefit from ssd ? | Justin Pryzby | 13:08 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Alvaro Herrera | 15:23 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: How to avoid UPDATE performance degradation in a transaction | Andres Freund | 04:35 |
| Re: SubtransControlLock and performance problems | Lars Aksel Opsahl | 09:20 |
| Re: tablespace to benefit from ssd ? | Jeff Janes | 17:30 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Can we have multiple tablespaces with in a database. | Daulat Ram | 04:45 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table | Ravi Garg | 09:56 |
| Re: PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table | Justin Pryzby | 10:12 |
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Peter J. Holzer | 10:19 |
| Re: PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table | Justin Pryzby | 10:46 |
| Re: PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table 📎 | Ravi Garg | 10:57 |
| Re: PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table | Justin Pryzby | 15:10 |
| Re: PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table | Imre Samu | 16:18 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade | Merlin Moncure | 16:34 |
| Re: PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table | Ravi Garg | 19:40 |
| Re: PostgreSQL 11 higher Planning time on Partitioned table | Ravi Garg | 19:44 |
| LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5 | Mani Sankar | 19:50 |
| Re: LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5 | Adrian Klaver | 20:58 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5 | Thomas Munro | 01:14 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables | remi duval | 14:53 |
| much slower query in production | Guillaume Cottenceau | 16:17 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Justin Pryzby | 16:28 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Michael Lewis | 16:52 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Guillaume Cottenceau | 18:02 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Guillaume Cottenceau | 18:04 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Michael Lewis | 18:18 |
| Re: much slower query in production | [email protected] | 19:18 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Guillaume Cottenceau | 19:37 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 20:40 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Jeff Janes | 22:59 |
| Re: much slower query in production | Jeff Janes | 23:17 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: much slower query in production | Guillaume Cottenceau | 08:31 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables | Pavel Stehule | 14:37 |
| RE: proposal: schema variables | DUVAL REMI | 14:59 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables | Pavel Stehule | 15:09 |
| Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Ben Snaidero | 16:33 |
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Michael Lewis | 16:54 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Ben Snaidero | 14:01 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 15:30 |
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Michael Lewis | 16:40 |
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Ben Snaidero | 16:53 |
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | legrand legrand | 19:00 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 09:09 |
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Jeff Janes | 16:21 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Ben Snaidero | 22:31 |
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | Ben Snaidero | 22:39 |
| Re: Many DataFileRead - IO waits | legrand legrand | 23:09 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Asif Rehman | 14:10 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 17:54 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| RE: proposal: schema variables | DUVAL REMI | 15:44 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 18:54 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 21:15 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 16:05 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 16:14 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 18:12 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | David Rowley | 02:47 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Justin Pryzby | 03:10 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 10:15 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 10:31 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Justin Pryzby | 12:12 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 13:08 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | Mariel Cherkassky | 13:16 |
| Re: pg12 partitions show bad performance vs pg96 | David Rowley | 21:43 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Richard Michael | 19:31 |
| Re: Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Justin Pryzby | 21:59 |
| Re: Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Tom Lane | 22:54 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Slow ext'd query via client native implementation vs. libpq & simple psql | Justin Pryzby | 20:43 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 18:44 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 05:58 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 07:18 |
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 08:28 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 12:02 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Andreas Kretschmer | 13:37 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Tom Lane | 14:26 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 15:45 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 15:59 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Tom Lane | 19:35 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 21:13 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Tom Lane | 22:55 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: proposal: schema variables 📎 | Pavel Stehule | 07:40 |
| JOIN on partitions is very slow | daya airody | 17:22 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | Michael Lewis | 18:08 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Partitions to improve write/update speed for tables with indexes? | Arya F | 01:22 |
| Re: Partitions to improve write/update speed for tables with indexes? | Justin Pryzby | 01:29 |
| Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 | Ronnie S | 03:45 |
| Re: Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 | Justin Pryzby | 04:10 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | daya airody | 07:40 |
| Re: Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 | Ronnie S | 14:18 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | Michael Lewis | 16:16 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | Thomas Kellerer | 16:33 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Random function | Luis Roberto Weck | 18:10 |
| Re: Random function | Tom Lane | 18:33 |
| Re: Random function | David G. Johnston | 18:33 |
| Re: Slow planning time when public schema included (12 vs. 9.4) | Anders Steinlein | 22:55 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 14:13 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Michael Lewis | 14:41 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Laurenz Albe | 14:46 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 14:55 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 14:56 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Rick Otten | 15:03 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Justin Pryzby | 15:09 |
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Ekaterina Amez | 15:15 |
| Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow | daya airody | 15:24 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Best way to delete big amount of records from big table | Laurenz Albe | 04:32 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 06:47 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 06:56 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 08:12 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 10:12 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 13:09 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 13:33 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 13:40 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Tom Lane | 16:02 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 16:18 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Tom Lane | 16:36 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Pavel Stehule | 16:49 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Could someone please help us share the procedure to troubleshoot the locks on proc issues. | postgann2020 s | 05:11 |
| slow query | dangal | 16:03 |
| Re: slow query | Justin Pryzby | 16:07 |
| Re: slow query | dangal | 16:18 |
| Re: Increasing work_mem slows down query, why? | Silvio Moioli | 21:46 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good | Tejaswini GC | 06:27 |
| Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 and system performance is not so good | Julien Rouhaud | 07:06 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Arya F | 17:48 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Andreas Kretschmer | 18:41 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Tom Lane | 18:55 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Arya F | 19:50 |
| Re: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select | Neil | 20:48 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 14:19 |
| Thread | Author | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Justin Pryzby | 04:59 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Tom Lane | 05:09 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Laurenz Albe | 06:42 |
| RE: Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 07:53 |
| RE: Postgres not using index on views | Rick Vincent | 09:08 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Thomas Kellerer | 09:18 |
| Re: Postgres not using index on views | Thomas Kellerer | 09:24 |
| Re: slow query | Michael Christofides | 10:20 |
| PostgreSQL DBA consulting | daya airody | 11:50 |
| Re: PostgreSQL DBA consulting | Justin Pryzby | 11:56 |