Re: Decreasing WAL size effects

From: Kyle Cordes <kyle(at)kylecordes(dot)com>
To: pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jason Long <mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Decreasing WAL size effects
Date: 2008-10-31 04:32:59
Message-ID: [email protected]
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Jason Long wrote:

> Sure I would rather have synchronous WAL shipping, but if that is going
> to be a while or synchronous would slow down my applicaton I can get
> comfortably close enough for my purposes with some highly compressible
> WALs.

I'm way out here on the outskirts (just a user with a small pile of
servers running PG)... I would also find any improvements in WAL
shipping helpful, between now and when continuous streaming is ready.

--
Kyle Cordes
http://kylecordes.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2008-10-31 07:06:27 Re: Decreasing WAL size effects
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-31 03:43:05 Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2008-10-31 05:18:08 can we create a record of more than one field?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-10-31 03:05:43 Re: BufferAccessStrategy for bulk insert