Andalon Historian

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
hyde-the-toad-bard
creampuffqueen

i say this with all my heart, from one person who cares about animal welfare to hopefully many others:

please take the term “factory farm” out of your vocabulary when discussing animal welfare

talking about the welfare of livestock and livestock production is incredibly important! all animals deserve to have the best welfare possible, regardless of if they’re going to end up on a plate or not

but the term “factory farm” does not actually discuss animal welfare in the way so many people seem to assume it does

for starters, “factory farm” is not an actual industry term. it doesn’t actually mean anything, because what constitutes a factory farm is completely subjective. you will never see the phrase “factory farm” in any kind of published research or official article because, again, it doesn’t mean anything

sure, the phrase definitely has connotations. and the connotation is the issue here. people use the term “factory farm” as a shorthand for… well, typically, “farming practice i don’t understand but think looks bad”

the term isn’t something neutral. it is specifically designed to create a negative image when you hear it. someone says “factory farm” and most people imagine large amounts of animals kept in bad condition

the key here: large amounts of animals

the size of a farm does not dictate the welfare of the animals on it. there are plenty of large farms with hundreds, thousands of animals that take stellar care of their livestock. there are small farms with only a couple animals that live horrible lives

the size of a farm is not the issue when it comes to animal welfare, but rather the practices used on the farm. sometimes they do go hand in hand, yes. there are some practices that are only necessary because of the amount of animals present

but say that

there are other terms that are actually industry terms that work better for these scenarios. try “conventional farming” “industrialized farming” “commercialized farming”. these actually have meanings that you can then jump off of into talking about animal welfare practices on these farms

“factory farming” is just a term used to paint farming in an entirely negative light, when what actually makes a farm have good or bad welfare depends on so many other things

andalon-historian

“the term isn’t something neutral. it is specifically designed to create a negative image when you hear it.”

Good? Keeping “huge amounts of animals” is bad and should be abolished, and creating a negative mental picture in peoples’ heads is a clearly good thing to do.

“there are plenty of large farms with hundreds, thousands of animals that take stellar care of their livestock”

No there are not LMFAO. It will never be as profitable to take “stellar care” of animals than to abuse them, and larger companies orient themselves around profit, not morality. Leftist website my ass.

“all animals deserve to have the best welfare possible, regardless of if they’re going to end up on a plate or not”

I’m afraid the animals that ended up on your plate did not have the best welfare possible. Definitionally. The best welfare would have involved not killing them.

animal welfare go vegan
jackpendarvis

Anonymous asked:

Distant Lands and Fionna and Cake season 2 both had a post credits teaser. One with evil Choose Goose and one with Hunson Abadeer. How much of an idea do you all have of where to take these things when you drop a stinger at the end?

jackpendarvis answered:

Sometimes a lot, sometimes none. If I am recalling correctly, the Choose Goose one was really just a parody of post-credit sequences. I may be misremembering, but I think we just found it funny. It proved to be very handy in Fionna and Cake Season 1, but as far as I recall, there wasn’t even talk of Fionna and Cake Season 1 yet. Now, I do recall that we had put CG in the lowest pit of hell in Together Again, so maybe we were tying that together in a loose way that we didn’t really take seriously. But! I seem to recollect (and all of this is only based on my own crummy memory) that Adam would get hilariously annoyed when we would try to squeeze Choose Goose into every Distant Lands story, and we had a lot of fun insisting on it, just for a good time, to make Adam grimace and laugh. I may be wrong, but I think Hanna took special pleasure in tormenting Adam with new Choose Goose ideas.

andalon-historian

I want to share that my friend just watched Distant Lands over the course of a couple weeks, and he noticed that Choose Goose was in the lowest pit of Hell and found it extremely funny, and kept asking “but why was Choose Goose in hell.”

So the after-credits stinger at the end worked on at least one person.

adventure time distant lands adventure time distant lands choose goose evil choose goose
markrosewater

stormtide-leviathan asked:

I think not doing ECL like this was definitely the right choice. However, hypothetically if you were making a lorwyn set and decided to structure it like Bloomburrow with each color pair getting a creature type, what color pair would you assign to each of lorwyn's 8 types and what new types would you use to fill in the remaining 2?

markrosewater answered:

Bloomburrow’s creature types were sele4cted to specifically hit all ten two-color combinations. Starting with eight preselected creature types wouldn’t allow us the same cleanliness.

andalon-historian

Shadowmoor sort of almost did this; there were a couple cycles between Shadowmoor and Eventide in all ten color pairs, and they tended to use:

WU- Kithkin
UB- Merrow (merfolk) and Faeries
BR- Elementals
RG- Boggarts (goblins) and Giants
GW- Elves
WB- Gwllions (hags)
UR- Noggles
BG- Hags and Trolls
RW- Duergar (dwarves) and Hobgoblins (goblins)
GU- Selkies (merfolk) and Beasts

The obvious thing you’ll notice immediately is that several of these have multiple creature types in them. And that a few types are in multiple colors.

It would be easy enough to cut one of the duplicates in each one, but then there’s several iconic creature types we’re missing.

We cut hobgoblins from RW, because the boggarts are the iconic goblins of Lorwyn-Shadowmoor. Similar with cutting the selkies from GU because the audience is here for the merrow.

We can move the Giants to RW to avoid cutting one of the Lorwyn types. Poor duergar.

Faeries are locked into UB. Merrow can go to WU, which pushes Kithkin to GW, which pushes elves to BG, so we’re cutting hags and trolls. Which is good because nobody remembers trolls and the hags were gonna get cut for the much cooler gwyllions.

That leaves us with:

WU- Merrow
UB- Faeries
BR- Flamekin
RG- Boggarts
GW- Kithkin
WB- Gwllions
UR- Noggles
BG- Elves
RW- Giants
GU- Beasts

That’s actually a shockingly elegant list. That’s way better than I thought we were going to get out of it. Beasts are the only one that stands out to me as less-than-inspired here.

Except that we forgot about treefolk. So. You could drop treefolk, or you could do GU treefolk. Or WB if you really wanted. GW and BG are both super taken.

It’s worth noting that the creative team in Lorwyn Eclipsed specifically shifted the Flamekin from BR to UR, a change from before. There’s also one Noggle in Lorwyn Eclipsed, and it’s RG; that would be a weird move if it’s a whole archetype imo, but we’re making changes here, so we can push: Flamekin into UR, Noggles into RG, and Boggarts into BR.

mtg lorwyn lorwyn-shadowmoor shadowmoor mtg ecl lorwyn eclipsed hypothetical what if

The year is 3XXX. Society doesn’t know who “Norma Jean” was, but scholarship broadly agrees that the mysterious “Marilyn” was an alternative name for the same woman; Elton John literalists, however, maintain that “Marilyn” must have been an additional woman found at the same time and place as Norma Jean, because how could an otherwise sympathetic character have been found “in the nude”?

elton john candle in the wind I have no idea how to tag this fake anthropology
goldensunset
goldensunset

the nearest depiction of an animal or other sentient fantasy creature to you at this moment comes to life right where it is (i.e. cat photograph, shark plushie, dragon painting, etc)

what happens to you

i am so dead

i need to go to the hospital

maybe a few things to be looked at but i’m fine in the end

i’m totally fine

i’m totally fine and i’m happy

my situation is really really really specific lemme tell you about it

n/a

See Results

assume it doesn’t know you (unless it’s actually a specific animal you’ve met) and that it’s normal for its species and would do whatever was natural for it. including being too giant for and destroying the room it’s in. as well as dying immediately if its environment can’t support its life

andalon-historian

image

I really don’t know how to answer this question.

is it a flamingo? is it the same size? does it have magic powers? I'm hopeful but idk what to do with this

“There’s no difference between Republicans and Democrats” my ass.

Next time there’s an election, you’re gonna see a lot of rhetoric again pretending to be leftist all about how Democrats aren’t any better than Republicans anyway. They are far-right plants. They might be bots, they might be employees, they might be trained monkeys, they might be useful dupes. They are propagandizing you to let fascists win.

There is a HUGE difference and I’m begging you people to remember that this country would not be like this right now if Democrats had won.

or if there was a general strike in this country imagine that happening us politics american politics us news republicans democrats trump A Democrat would not have killed over a hundred people in international waters without trial nor even evidence A Democrat would not have started another war and killed even more And so so so much more
seat-safety-switch
seat-safety-switch

One of the most up-and-coming genres on YouTube entertainment these days is the "car rescue." Some intrepid folks with a bunch of tools and probably too much time pull some massive turd out of a farmhouse, or river, or swamp, and then spend a 40- to 160-minute long video turning it back into a working car. While I can only watch YouTube videos at the public library, I have been exposed to this phenomena the hard way.

My city, which is devoid of its former industrial base and really any other kind of major employment, is kept aloft by what the kids call "hustle culture." Folks delivering burritos at the behest of anonymous benefactors. Picking groceries off shelves in accordance with the demands of a little text field saying "no shitty avocados." And striving to launch their YouTube careers, which will surely lead into a steady source of sponsored income, and not at all a terrifying series of oscillations between poverty and mania. It's this last group that's the problem.

You see, these restoration videos need a constant source of broke-ass cars to make them possible. Any major urban centre could easily provide enough supply for one channel's demand. After all, you can only fix broken cars so quickly, even if they're desirable ones. As you may recall from the preceding paragraph, however, my city is ninety percent YouTubers by volume, so there's always folks on the prowl for badly-maintained cars. Badly maintained cars like the ones I own several dozen of.

Every morning, I awaken to find a new set of notes on my crap-cans, offering to buy them. I field pitches, some recorded, at my front door, looking to save my valueless Plymouths for The Content. Sometimes they even offer to do it for free and drop it back off at my place, where it is hoped that natural entropy will produce another video on the same car. Naturally, I say no. I'm going to get around to fixing all of these properly, I explain at length, while pop-riveting a "Thin Ice" road sign into the spot where my passenger floorboard used to exist. Besides, I don't need any additional fame, because cops watch YouTube too.

Most of these entrepreneurs leave, their heads hanging in sadness that I will not help them start their journey to the promised land of automotive journalism. Some get a little sneakier. Just last week, I caught a pair of kids trying to replace a rear drum brake on one of the Mercury Bobcats I left too close to the property line. Little shits did a pretty good job, but their editing sucks, especially how they failed to include the part where I chased them off with a torque wrench in the thumbnail. You'll never get that gold play button with a hustle like that.

incredible love this