hiya-gayass:

yasmin1000000:

people saying that being trans is a white only thing is very strange to me because i remember when i was a kid people acted like it was pretty much only black people and thai people who were trans. obvsiouly both of those things are based in racism and transmisogyny but the rapid shift is strange

I had to bring these out of the tags because the last 2 tags especially!!!! ☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼

(via closet-keys)

lilyblisslys:

lilyblisslys:

can someone draw this post as doctor who selfcest pornography

sorry wrong account

(via senator-onahole)

dogpuppy:

(via stoptheantisemitism)

smuganimebitch:

smuganimebitch:

To this day I still don’t believe that anyone actually thought you could generate infinite chocolate via an optical illusion. That’s a thing people tell themselves to feel superior

The defining feature of tumblr is not “the website where people actually think infinite chocolate is possible”, it is defined by a group of people refusing to break kayfabe, another group being genuinely confused by an optical illusion (NOT the same thing as thinking infinite chocolate is possible) and a third group who is certain they are a lot smarter than the other two.

(via asparklethatisblue)

kuttithevangu:

When maids and concubines do murders in historical dramas I don’t think that’s a crime. They should be allowed to do that

(via pineapplecrushface)

ms-demeanor:

This is a really excellent deep dive into AI water use and how a lot of discourse around it is at best inaccurate and at worst deliberately misleading.

A great example of how it’s misleading is the NYT story about an AI datacenter causing local wells to dry up for residents, but the story is actually about the construction causing water issues - the datacenter wasn’t active, hadn’t been finished, and the construction could easily have been for a shipping hub or housing development. Framing “construction company did not do appropriate groundwater surveys and fucked up the water table” as “data centers guzzling up water” is extremely disingenuous.

The substack article I linked is quite long and quite technical, and if you’re not interested in reading it Hank Green has made a video discussing the fact that there is a lot more nuance in the discourse around AI water use than the most vocal Pro-AI or Anti-AI people are interested in examining.

There are a lot of people who say that all AI use is theft. I think that’s uncomplicatedly wrong, that if you’re using “theft” the way that the DMCA uses “theft” you’re wrong. For more on that, I’d recommend reading the “Expanding Copyright is not the Answer” section of @mostlysignssomeportents’s adapted speech on AI criticism or the EFF’s comments to the copyright office RE generative AI. (You should actually read both, and you should read Doctorow’s article in full because it is a criticism of AI that moves beyond thought terminating cliches to really explore why the AI industry as it stands is bullshit).

I do not, generally speaking, like AI. I think that most AI products create shit results. I think most AI art looks like shit and most AI writing is awful bordering on unreadable. I think that there’s a massive bubble built up around AI and I think AI is absolutely fucking the personal computing market.

And, all that said, it is deeply annoying to dislike AI as much as I do and still feel the need to point out that the way that a lot of people criticize AI is shortsighted, reactionary, and just flat-out incorrect. There are real things wrong with how we are approaching AI as a society and how AI is being sold to users and forced into our environments, and “art theft” is not one of those things.

(And this is everyone’s reminder that fair use is the best, I love it, and you are allowed to copy, distribute, remix, sell, and do whatever you want with my art and writing whenever you want to. Every time I write something like this people come into my inbox to say “I hope your art gets stolen” and I’m like “Bitch, me too, the fuck?”)

(via a-little-bit-oddish)

frostedmagnolias:

Day Dress

c. 1897

Historic Deerfield Museum

(via autumngracy)

teathattast:

landsccape:

This is me btw

(via goodstuffhappenedtoday)

hope-for-the-planet:

First-of-its-kind study definitively shows that conservation actions are effective at halting and reversing biodiversity loss

A new study published online today, April 25, in the scientific journal Science provides the strongest evidence to date that not only is nat

Global Environment Facility

From the article:

“If you look only at the trend of species declines, it would be easy to think that we’re failing to protect biodiversity, but you would not be looking at the full picture,” said Penny Langhammer, lead author of the study and Executive Vice President of Re:wild. “What we show with this paper is that conservation is, in fact, working to halt and reverse biodiversity loss. It is clear that conservation must be prioritized and receive significant additional resources and political support globally, while we simultaneously address the systemic drivers of biodiversity loss, such as unsustainable consumption and production.”

This massive meta analysis (for those not familiar, a study analyzing the results of many studies on similar topics) found that the vast majority of conservation efforts show much much better results than doing nothing. In many cases, biodiversity loss was not only stopped but reversed.

This shows that conservation efforts really work and money invested is put to very good use. Legally protecting endangered species really works, restoring habitat really works, removing invasive species really works, returning land to Indigenous communities works. All of the blood, sweat, and tears being poured into protecting the natural world has been making a real, big, tangible, difference on a global scale.

(via brostateexam)

redstonedust:

tragic when a thing gets hate for being ‘woke trash’ and you look into it and its not even that woke. like cmon man i was promised monacle popping gay commie propaganda. this is just a video game with a woman in it.

(via autumngracy)