Package Details: amdgpu-pro-oglp 25.10_2202160-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/amdgpu-pro-installer.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: amdgpu-pro-installer
Description: AMDGPU Pro OpenGL driver
Upstream URL: https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/release-notes/rn-amdgpu-unified-linux-22-40
Licenses: custom: AMDGPU-PRO EULA
Groups: Radeon_Software_for_Linux
Provides: libgl
Submitter: LEW21
Maintainer: mesmer
Last Packager: mesmer
Votes: 125
Popularity: 0.077441
First Submitted: 2016-03-28 22:44 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-09-28 21:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (766)

Sources (18)

Pinned Comments

mesmer commented on 2025-09-28 21:29 (UTC) (edited on 2025-09-28 21:32 (UTC) by mesmer)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

updated to 6.4.4, from this version up it changed to 7.x the 7.x don't seem to have the proprietary driver in the jammy or noble(7.0.0 and 7.0.1), so it seems that the driver is already at mesa !!! it means that it will not receive any update on forward, i will wait just to make sure but it seems the 6.4.4 is the last pro driver :)

mesmer commented on 2022-12-23 04:31 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-28 19:28 (UTC) by mesmer)

IF PROBLEM HAPPEN

this package is our try to put amdgpu in ARCH, but this could break or have problems as amd update and change their packages for ubuntu

if anything happens you can always download a older tag in https://github.com/Ashark/archlinux-amdgpu-pro/releases and get the PKGBUILD there, and use makepkg with that build while we update or try to fix :)

ALWAYS USE LINUX-FIRMWARE-GIT IF LATEST DRIVER FAIL BEFORE ISSUE SOME ERROR

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-firmware-git

Ashark commented on 2019-12-09 20:52 (UTC) (edited on 2022-12-06 08:45 (UTC) by Ashark)

PKGBUILD generator is located here: https://github.com/Ashark/archlinux-amdgpu-pro

AMDGPU PRO wiki page: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AMDGPU_PRO

New versions will appear here: https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 62 Next › Last »

mesmer commented on 2025-10-04 13:27 (UTC)

The minor version is in the Noble, just go for all the problem to test and make sure it works in noble for a small change don't seems to be worth, at least if it don't fix anything great, if anyone need this small bump is easy to run the scripts to generate with noble, but I'll not be able to help with issues.

Just to be clear, it's not that the package will be inside mesa, just the great part that why this package was made for will now be part of mesa. If no new proprietary folder appear this package will not update too

niobium93 commented on 2025-10-04 07:27 (UTC)

6.4.4 also contains packages with a slightly higher minor version for 24.04 - 2203192 vs. 2202160. Wouldn't it be better to update to this?

Also, to be clear, the pro driver isn't and will never be part of mesa. It was an optional alternative to mesa and is now discontinued. Mesa continues to contain it's own RadeonSI and RADV drivers for AMD.

mesmer commented on 2025-09-28 21:30 (UTC) (edited on 2025-09-28 21:33 (UTC) by mesmer)

@aliu maybe if this package keep receiving updates, but it is faded to be removed as its part of mesa right now, you can always just install part of the package ofc like package_lib32-amdgpu-pro-oglp

mesmer commented on 2025-09-28 21:29 (UTC) (edited on 2025-09-28 21:32 (UTC) by mesmer)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

updated to 6.4.4, from this version up it changed to 7.x the 7.x don't seem to have the proprietary driver in the jammy or noble(7.0.0 and 7.0.1), so it seems that the driver is already at mesa !!! it means that it will not receive any update on forward, i will wait just to make sure but it seems the 6.4.4 is the last pro driver :)

aliu commented on 2025-09-28 19:59 (UTC)

It would be wonderful if this package was 5 separate pkgbase-s so we wouldn't have to download all these excess files just to install one of these packages, say amf-amdgpu-pro. Since the PKGBUILD is generated from a python script anyways, would it be possible to make this 5 normal packages instead?

muller_md commented on 2025-09-07 10:05 (UTC)

For the brave one, the patch to get to 25.10.2.1

mesmer commented on 2025-09-06 19:52 (UTC)

Thats a problem for AMD releases, we cant be sure about, i need to test the Noble, and even If its allright its hard to know because a 6.4.3 exist in the jammy. They did the same other times and returned to jammy.

But i Will test the Noble If It Works i use that

niobium93 commented on 2025-09-06 15:34 (UTC)

@mesmer I think you're wrong about version 6.4.3. https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/6.4.3/ubuntu/dists/jammy/proprietary/binary-amd64/Packages is empty, but https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/6.4.3/ubuntu/dists/noble/proprietary/binary-amd64/Packages isn't. The actual package files like https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/6.4.3/ubuntu/pool/proprietary/v/vulkan-amdgpu-pro/vulkan-amdgpu-pro_25.10-2194696.24.04_amd64.deb also exist. It seems they moved from Ubuntu 22.04 to 24.04.

mesmer commented on 2025-08-24 17:09 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-24 17:15 (UTC) by mesmer)

Regarding the "Outdated" Flag

For whoever is flagging this as outdated: as stated in the project's GitHub documentation, you need to check https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/.

The latest versions available are:

6.4.2.1/ (06-Aug-2025 19:09)
6.4.3/ (07-Aug-2025 15:06)

The version you are flagging as the cause of the outdated (6.4.3) has NO PROPRIETARY RELEASE.

Check for yourself: https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/6.4.3/ubuntu/dists/jammy/proprietary/binary-amd64/ (The Packages file is 0 bytes: https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/6.4.3/ubuntu/dists/jammy/proprietary/binary-amd64/Packages)

This means version 6.4.3 is NOT READY FOR USE.

Therefore, only https://repo.radeon.com/amdgpu/6.4.2.1/ubuntu/dists/jammy/proprietary/binary-amd64/ is ready to be used. Sometimes AMD does that releases that we cannot use, or that are not ready at all, that happens a lot of times, don't flag this outdated for this cases

Please stop flagging packages as outdated when they don't have a complete proprietary release.

d2_ricci commented on 2025-08-17 22:36 (UTC)

Thanks for all who contributed time in maintaining this package base.

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 62 Next › Last »