i want to do a painting of a tiger taking a bath to put in a bathroom (bathroom-themed bathroom) and to this end i made a little maquette out of clay and i suspect this will scope creep into having both a painting and sculpture of a tiger or perhaps only a sculpture of a tiger. if i do both should they be displayed together or separately
at midnight it will be the year I get married :)
probably my favorite thing about pluribus is making a character out of a virus. all a virus does is make more of itself, that’s the only “prerogative” it has. a virus operates like machinery in that way, and I really like how much the choreography in the show makes that really visually clear. you never see people moving like that naturally (how many takes was that???). a virus doesn’t have motivation, it’s just that its function is to make more of itself. so, insert that function into a fuckton of human beings… does it start to look like kindness, just because they totally disengage from the world? they don’t set animals loose out of compassion, it’s just that for whatever reason they can’t physically hurt living things–maybe biological imperative, so they don’t accidentally destroy another potential host?–and their energy is best spent on the primary task. Domestic animals that run off and are essentially helpless on their own aren’t their problem. I think it’s fun because there have been a lot of misreads of the show of being like wow communist utopia when it’s like. no. it’s. a virus? it’s doing what a virus does, it’s just that it has an insane amalgam of people to operate through. it’s fun for me especially because I have always loved thinking about viruses that alter animal behavior, and what would it look like for that to work the same way in humans? Like toxoplasmosis, if there was a notable impact, how would we justify our own behavior to ourselves? and now pluribus :)
chicken in pluribus is looking directly at the camera. the only bad performance in the show
Guys can we please stop with the whole “frog-pig hybrid” when talking about Muppets Christmas Carol. Tiny Tim isn’t a frog-pig hybrid. The muppets are putting on a theatre production of Christmas Carol and Tiny Tim is being played by Kermit’s nephew Robin, who is a frog. Yes, for realism they could have hired a frog-pig hybrid. But they didn’t and that’s okay because Robin did amazing in his role.
Whilst this may appear to be some sort of art work composed solely of frisbees, it is in fact today’s echinoderm - Dendraster excentricus, commonly known as the eccentric sand dollar or the sea cake.
Image source: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145839714
Its just. So fucking wonderful that an animal can just be a hairy disk. I've known all about them all my life and they just don't ever get boring. I saw them alive in person for the first time just in august at monterey bay.
And that hairy disk is more a cousin to us backbone havers than the vast majority of animal life. Squids and insects and various worms have eyes and brains and limbs like we would recognize but they are all more distant to us than the little faceless crunchy biscuit that sits in the sand on its side and eats seawater.
I bet it feels good as fuck to kick someone in the head as hard as you can if you’re a horse
Every time I see a duck I think to myself that I want to pick up that duck. There is a sort of quality of the duck that makes it feel like the act of picking up the duck would somehow be analogous to those strange videos where people use knives to cleanly cut through multilayered cakes. There would be a sort of accumulative act even without taking permanent possession of the duck. It would rather be more like pulling the lever on some ancient machine which makes a counter increase by one. The duck is the lever. I hope my meaning is clear to you all?

















