Cellulosaurus' obsessions

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
knuppitalism-with-ue
knuppitalism-with-ue

image

I actually wanted to further talk about this sketch from last night a little, as it not only serves as an full body depiction of the animal but also a cheek in tongue critique of the paper describing Manipulonyx.

image

This animal, an alvarezsaur, is known from various bones, most importantly a complete hand that reveals novel structures for this group. Specifically osteoderms sitting on the side and palm of the hand. The authors speculated that these structures would have a specific, practical purpose and proposed that they would be used for grabbing, transporting and opening larger dinosaur eggs.

image

While this appears an interesting idea and I certainly think that occasional consumption of eggs wasn't off the table for this animals I doubt that they were specialized in this way. At least to the degree that it actively shaped their limbs.

And here is why I think that:

Eggs are a very seasonal treat. While certain areas with a stable climate can see a year long supply of eggs from different species, the Nemegt formation, where this animal was found, is unlikely to provide such a stable egg supply. The climate was quite seasonal, in winter maybe even reached freezing temperatures occasionally. Not ideal when you have to wait months for your main source of food to return.

Which brings us to the next point. Animals today, that are specialized in egg consumption are usually "cold blooded", as these are usually too rare of a treat to fuel more active creatures.

The fossils of Manipulonyx were indeed found in the vicinity of larger dinosaur eggs but being found together with them doesn't mean the animal predated on these. Beyond that the paper doesn't provide a taphonomic explanation for the locality, meaning: how did this fossils end up here? Were they preserved in situ or were the fossils maybe transported, how long did it take for the fossils to accumulate?

The limbs of Manipulonyx do not look like they would be great for transporting eggs. Especially the palmar osteoderm seems in the way when trying to hold anything, I wouldn't the surprised if the hand overall was actually quite rigid.

The idea of these animal would go after eggs that they can wrap their arms around begs the question what juvenile Manipulonyx would eat. Did smaller/younger individuals simply go for smaller eggs? Would there be ontogenetic niche shift? That seems, in my eyes, unlikely.


So what did they use their arms for? Please take everything you read here with a grain of salt, as an artist who hasn't seen the fossils personally I can only provide limited insight into this. Non of what you read here is peer reviewed research. Non the less I think there are some alternative ideas what is animal did that seem, for the moment, more likely to me.

Most prominently I see two possibility, both related and based on observations on modern birds:

  1. Display, the age old argument, I know, but tons of spikes on really short arms just don't seem really practical. But with some flashy colors... who knows, I am not kink shaming.
  2. Intraspecific combat. Many modern day birds have wing spurs, often times visible even in the bone. They might look weird but many birds are known for beating each other with their wings, the arms of Manipulonyx were short yes, but I think they would still allow for some wrestling matches. In birds they are also used for defense but given the arm length of Manipulonyx I think that's not as likely ;)
image
image

Ok rant over.

paleoart sciart palaeoblr cretaceous manipulonyx alvarezsaur nemegt mongolia paleobiology controversy early morning thoughts I needed to write down
jasper-dracona
charlemane

writing tip: searching "[place of origin]ish names" will get you a lot of stuff and nonsense made up by baby bloggers.

searching "[place] census [year]" will get you lists of real names of real people who lived in that place.

homoqueerjewhobbit

I feel like I'm constantly shilling for them but BehindTheName.com, the only baby name site that doesn't feel like it's run by mommy bloggers, includes census-based graphs for dozens of countries/regions (though not all of them go back very far yet)

image

And you can expand them to see rank, number of babies, and percentage of babies and add a second name to compare. (in 1973 four percent of babies were named Jennifer! 1 in 25!!!)

image

Also this. Cursed.

emperorsfoot

@homoqueerjewhobbit what name did you search for your example, and what's going on with Moldova?

homoqueerjewhobbit

Those are the graphs for Samuel. They only have 1 year's data for Moldova right now, so that's why it's a straight line. Similarly, they only have 2 years for Mexico right now. The US goes back to 1880. I'm not sure how much of that is publicly available/translated records and how much of it is that it's like 1 or 2 guys maintaining a website of 27000 names and a finite amount of time to format and upload.

Here's the list of all of the countries/regions they have popularity statistics for if you want to nerd out on it!

some-teeth-in-a-trench-coat

You can't advertise BehindTheName for writers without mentioning the advanced search! You can search names based on cultural origin and usage, gender (including unisex), meaning, and even things like meter and number of syllables, or famous namesakes (you can also see a list of famous namesakes on every name's page, along with meaning, history, related names, alternate spellings in different languages, the above popularity graphs, and more).

I wouldn't even call BehindTheName a baby name site. They have a surname sister site and a random name generator with tons of variables to set that is very clearly intended to be used for fictional characters (iirc it can even generate a cause of death? I haven't looked at it in many years so it might have changed but these things predate generative AI so unless it's been forcefully enshittified it shouldn't be slop). Like, you can use it for baby names, but the website isn't explicitly intended for that purpose. This website caters to us.

professorzamitespokemons
professorzamitespokemons

image

Komala is a lovely pokemon, but one who’s design is kinda boring. It really is just a koala hugging a branch

So I thought, if koalas aren’t native to Hawai’i, what mammals are? Turns out, like New Zealand, only seals, cetaceans and one species of bat are. Specifically, the Hawai’i hoary bat (an absolute cutie), and to me they look kinda like little koalas

So here we are, with a flightless sloth-koala folivorous bat instead of the normal sleepy marsupial route everyone else in their right mind would have taken. (Also I’m not a big fan of flightless bats in spec because of how unlikely they are but this is my exception)

Anyway, flavor text:

“Komala (Patagiursa cinereus)
Komalas are a species of strange arboreal mammalian pokemons. While they are related to pokemons such as Woobat or Noivern, they are entirely flightless and live a similar life to young slakoths. They feed on toxic leaves from local trees, but the digestion process is very energy consuming so they need to sleep nearly 20h a day. Despite that they can still react to external stimuli and attack if threatened, relying on their great hearing.”

jasper-dracona
blkdyke-deactivated20230921

A good video that accurately explains why stud is a term used for black lesbians only, not white, not poc, BLACK

I’m not even going to say please. Respect black identities and labels, they are ours for a reason.

daddyisatitlenotagender

Imma need this reblogged by white queer tumblr users since it’s mostly yall who wanna use it or want to know why you or other white people shouldn’t/can’t use the term “stud”

sanguinewolves

[video description: a tiktok made by @/callmekellin, responding to a comment that reads “what does being black have to do with being a stud …….”

the person in the video is a fem presenting black person in their car. they say “i love that you asked, lemme give you a little history lesson. full disclaimer, no hate to the commenter, i’m just giving everybody a bit of a debrief! now firstly, let’s talk about where the term stud actually comes from.

back in the days of slavery, when people still used to refer to us as animals, black people that were taller were known to be stronger because they could do more work. so down in the south, they started comparing us to horses. that then coined the term[s] studs for men, and stallions for females. like megan thee stallion. it was really big in the south. to compare us to animals.

but enough about the bleach brigade, let’s actually get back into the history. as you know, or if you don’t know, black women were not able to enter the working class until well into the 1960s. before then, there was a small populous of women that were still working, even though they technically were not supposed to.

‘how was it possible?’ these women would be dressing more masculine—using binders in order to help put down their chests, dressing more in a male form—and because of the fact that most bleach bandits believed that we, as black women, were already masculine, they got away with it. thus coining the term, in the black community, “stud.” because all the dudes knew, but she was one of the guys. so what did it matter?

any time the chlorine community would come up to black people and be like “hey! is that a female working!?” the guys would just save her and be like ‘nah, that’s a stud right there.” it was joke to them because they all knew. but as times changed and slang did too, the black community still keeps it close at heart. and yes, it was rooted in racism, but we’re taking it back for ourselves.

so once again, if you’re not a black, masculine lesbian that wants to be called a stud, you’re not a stud. you’re a masculine lesbian. even a butch if you want to. i hope that explained it!” end video description.]

queerasaurolophus
dreg-heap

Can't let British people have air conditioning because first they'd call it something twee like "the climate fixer" and then in 20 years they'll call it "the climb" or "the climmy"

dreg-heap

French kids would call it "le climot", frustrating language officials who would prefer they call it "machine pour le contrôle du climat froide à l'interieure de l'édifice"

counting-horses

These posts contain 26 horses!

𓃗 @dreg-heap

Can't let British people have air conditioning because first they'd call it something twee like "the climate fixer" and then in 20 years they'll call it "the climb" or "the climmy"

𓃗 @dreg-heap

French kids would call it "le climot", frustrating language officials who would prefer they call it "machine pour le contrôle du climat froide à l'interieure de l'édifice"

Posts are selected by humans, processed automatically and queued to post. Click the link for more information about each horse. You can send a link or text to be counted to my ask box.

actually we call that “la clim” but I dearly hope future kids call it “climot” that's so much better
jasper-dracona
rosefinchie

image

how it all feels lately

rosefinchie

image

yeah actually this was a very literal piece of vent art bc i got a notification about cheese recalls while making dinner :') might as well add the info since i didnt expect so many people to share my doodle

merps

Article date: January 8, 2026

oreo-pudding
cellulosaurus

image

WE DON’T ACTUALLY KNOW IF AJKACERATOPS FERENCERATOPS AND ZALMOXES HAD A FRILL OR NOT WE DON’T ACTUALLY KNOW IF AJKACERATOPS FERENCERATOPS AND ZALMOXES HAD A FRILL OR NOT WE DON’T ACTUALLY KNOW IF AJKACERATOPS FERENCERATOPS AND ZALMOXES HAD A FRILL OR NOT


that whole “frilless european ceratopsians” is the definition of a paleomeme wake up people we don’t have the back of the skull of any of these weirdoes

image
image
image
image

Don’t blame ya though the press art is frilless and all the press released gobbled that up as facts

knuppitalism-with-ue

Counterpoint: WE ALSO DON'T KNOW IF THESE ARE ACTUALLY CERATOPSIANS FOR SURE!

IT'S A HYPOPHESIS FOR NOW! NOT MUCH MORE

cellulosaurus

they are european parankylosaurs………