labeling random nonbinary people as transmasc or transfem without asking for their preference is misgendering.

not all nonbinary people identify as transmasc or transfem. some people are both. some are neither. some use a different term (some examples: null, androgynous, neutral). some only call themselves "nonbinary".

whatever you think their agab was doesnt determine which box they fit into. agab doesnt determine gender quality or presentation.

let nonbinary people be nonbinary without being pushed into a brand new binary of "transmasc or transfem". thank you.

It’s 2026 let’s be a little more chill about physical nonhumans

people, especially younger people/minors, on platforms like twitter, bluesky, tiktok and instagram are too comfortable with censorship without even knowing that it’s literally a fascist textbook. “so I am personally uncomfortable with these fictional things, therefore it deserves to be censored/erased from existence and anybody who disagrees with me should be harassed and crucified for it”

don’t like something? cool. curate your own internet experience by muting/blocking what you don’t want to see. don’t make it other people’s problem to censor themselves and cater to your personal comfort. no one in real life is getting harmed because a fanfiction someone somewhere writes is taboo.

RAAAH I DON'T KNOW HOW TO BE SERIOUS. But i really wanted to talk about how I'm a very territorial wolf.

It's kind of inconvenient for me in my human body and human society life, but I'm territorial! I'm careful about how close i let other people get to me, i don't let anybody just touch me, which does sound like common sense but trust me, some individuals have touched me without asking me beforehand, mainly my hair and it pisses me off. I'm not going to let other beings get close to me, i have my own space, that's mine, my territory. The same goes for many of my interests, i get jealous when people start doing the same things as me and are better at it. I'm territorial over things that aren't even mine. Like i get a bad feeling when someone i love and care for sudenly likes the same things as me or looks into them to bond with me, but i feel like it's supposed to be mine! Even though i do not own it in any way. I just feel like it's a me thing to do and be. Which also applies to people, like i get jealous of it when they hang out with other packs. Like i have my own "pack", it consists of 2 people who are fully human and the two have never actually met but they're my safe space. They're my pack. And i get jealous when they start hanging out with other packs. Like pf course I'm not saying I'm the only friend they should ever have, i encourage them to have other friends even!

But I'm such a territorial being that i get territorial over things that aren't mine or maybe aren't even things, and even people.

My wolfnes afects me more than just woof woof I'm a wolp many times and it's kind of annoying that people irl don't see it but my pack does and they acept me :3 so yeah I'm glad for that

i actually get the exact same “people i care about can’t like the Thing I Love because it’s mine” feeling! and it absolutely feels silly because i know logically i don’t own it. logically it should be fun that we have the same interest.

but its just. mine. my thing. grrrr leave it alone

Pt under cut, help with IDs appreciated !

“biological therian” was supposed to be the word we get to have to mean we’re literally, physically, genetically our theriotypes! it was supposed to be the one term we get to keep, after “physical therian” evolved to mean basically any nonhuman for any reason!

what do you MEAN you’re “biologically a therian but know your body is actually completely scientifically physically human”!!! do you know what biologically means!!!!!!

it is so unbelievably frustrating having our terms taken from us and watered down over and over and over again. can literal physical nonhumans not have anything to ourselves? all of our terms must be taken from us and morphed into something else? and what’s worse, so often those ‘physical nonhumans’ taking those terms will then turn around to us and go “wait, you think you’re ACTUALLY physically nonhuman?? that’s delusional!”

AAAAAARFHGHHHH

Someone can be a biological therian and also not be delusional. Believing that your physical biology is 100% animal in the literal sense IS a delusion, you getting mad about it won’t change that.

phew, good thing i’m only like,,, 85% biologically an animal! no delusions here ;)

i don’t feel like you’re qualified to be armchair diagnosing people you don’t know with delusions over the internet, anyway.

you can be a biological therian without delusion, that’s true! you cannot, however, be a biological therian without believing your biology is animal.

biological therians, clinical zoanthropes, and p-shifters! I'm interested in your experience!

if you are one of those in any way, consider interacting with this post :•)

and if you aren't one of those, but know any interesting blogs or outside resources, maybe consider sharing them!

this subject is sadly hard to come by because of the stigma the community still holds, but I genuinely want to learn;

i’m a biological dog therian :)

for me this means i believe my blood, dna, and physical brain are all that of a dog’s. the first one i noticed was my brain: i have always felt like i have a nonhuman brain. like something about my brain, not only my mind and the way i think, but about the physical structure and wiring of my brain was different. it causes me to identify as a dog, and largely why i call my dog theriotype both psychological and physical. i have canine neurons, i have canine electrical impulse patterns.

then, it was my dna. i started to feel like deep down inside me, my actual biology was closer to that of a canine. like i was a canine through and through. a lot of this came about during my first year of veterinary technician school, where we learned a lot about the anatomy and physiology of dogs (and other pets). every lesson i’d be sitting there thinking “hm…… that sounds just like me…..” and i’d look at diagrams and be like “hm….. that looks like my cells and my dna….” about the canine dna. at the time i didn’t know about biological nonhumans, and since i knew my external body was physically human i didn’t think i counted as a ‘physical nonhuman’. i’ve learned since that i do :)

most recently, i’ve started believing my blood is nonhuman as well. i’m not sure exactly what spurred this belief; possibly my 2nd year of vet tech school, where we discussed canine and feline blood in detail. i remember specifically our lesson about blood types and cross matching for blood transfusions. learning about canine blood felt the same; “hm….. that’s me….. why’s this exactly like my blood….” and i learned that my blood type as a collie would likely be DEA 1.1 negative. i feel like their is dog running in my veins, so to speak, so logically (at least to me), i believe this to be my blood.

i do also consider myself a physical nonhuman, but recently have been preferring biological nonhumans due to the way ‘physical’ is now overrun with creatures who,,,, don’t actually consider their physical bodies nonhuman at all. it’s kind of lost its meaning to me, it doesn’t describe my experience anymore. i find “biological” to not only be more accurate (talking specifically about my dna, blood cells, and brain cells) but also take more literally (although that is changing now too; folks will say they are biologically nonhuman and still somehow not believe their body is in any way nonhuman. lost the plot atp).

i do also experience some visual hallucination physical shifts, but these are always drug induced and so not similar to most p-shifters experiences. i do value my drug induced physical shifts very highly. i love those guys <333 they mean so much to me and give me such species euphoria to feel like myself.

being biologically canine doesn’t really affect my relationships at all, i dont think? not anymore than being a non-physical therian does. i do find it hard to relate to most humans and hard to socially comprehend interactions, and perhaps i can chalk that up to the canine brain, but i don’t truly know.

anyway,,,, sorry for the wall of text! but i love sharing my physical nonhuman experiences, and i love hearing others’ experiences, so i really enjoy reading the reblog of this post! :)

Courtesan Occuden!

An occuden term for when one is a courtesan occuden; when the role/occupation of a courtesan is intrinsic to one’s identity.

ID in Alt Text

Tags: @radiomogai, @occuden-archive, @rwuffles

pt/ the potion maker appreciate reblogs but doesn't require them.

Petrownia !

Petrownia (pet-row-ni-a) - a tertairy / fragarian attraction in where someone feels attracted to people in the way a pet would love it's owner. This can interpreted however the user wishes.

(This flag does not support pro-c zoophilia. Do not use it or take it as such.)

Opposite of Propripet

If you want to stand up for transgender Canadians, then there's a petition to ask the federal government to repeal the acts signed into law that restrict transgender medical care for transgender youth:

You need only be a resident of Canada, not a citizen to sign. Please help us give transgender youth a fighting chance. Their medical care decisions should be between the handling physician and family only. This isn't a matter for politicians to decide.

hey, so I would he grateful if people living in Canada could sign this and if non-Canadians could signal boost, please.

my maybe controversial therian opinion is that i have never been able to figure out why we prioritize human life over animals. i think it's just an anthropocentrism thing. there's like... no real reason for it. i also think it's because i'm autistic and my sense of empathy is a little ...warped? but i still don't get it lol

this. there is no reason other than anthropocentrism, speciesism, and selfishness. humans who think they are more important than any other species are simply speciesist and only looking out for their own interests.

i’ve had this argument with many people in a comment thread recently. the only argument any of them could produce is “but humans are more intelligent”. so to that i say: do we judge the value of human lives based on who is most intelligent? do we think that intellectually disabled humans are worth less than other humans? do we only consider humans with high IQs valuable? or do we recognize that that is deeply flawed and ableist? i think the answer should be obvious.

i have never heard a valid argument for “human lives are more important than animal lives” despite that being a common viewpoint among speciesist humans.