I think this essay is really valuable and important as a first-hand account of a black trans woman being falsely accused of abuse and sexual assault.
It's also important to note that while some of the accusers described are far right people that inserted themselves into queer spaces... that is nonetheless a scenario queer organizers need to think and talk about, need to plan and adjust for. We can't be sitting ducks for bad people who do malicious trolling IRL the way others only do online.
Finding out how these far righters are able to make accusations that wield that many consequences is really important.
I also think this essay needs to cause some reflection about established concepts like Catherine McKinnon's approach to consent and the notion of transmisogyny itself.
It's disturbing people use McKinnon's model to be radical about consent, because McKinnon's model addresses sexual assault after it occurs, rather than removing the incentives. And importantly, McKinnon's model allows people to imagine that they are at their most radical when they ruthlessly cut off people who are accused of committing harm, even when there's a complete lack of evidence. Also, McKinnon's model lets powerful people get away with assault (think of Joe Biden's defense after he was accused) while less powerful people are convicted in the court of public opinion without evidence. What better tool could far right trolls that want to weed out promising progressives (or have fun with their favourite victims) ask for?
I also think it might be more productive to think of each uniquely black transfemme experience detailed as it's own specific problem:
- a black transfemme that didn't dare speak out because her housing was dependent on one of the people involved -> Housing
- black transfemmes often don't have a black transfemme point of comparison for their victimization (no Emmett Till or Hot Allostatic Load essay specifically speaking to their experiences) -> Unique Voicelessness
- black transfemmes having to bear both narratives of male and female aggressivity at the same time -> there's some unique moments in this that black transfemmes know of best of all, but I think all marginalized people know this framing. This is how most privileged people frame those who speak up. I'm not saying white cis girls or black cis men face both narratives at the same time...but that's not because society wouldn't do it to them if it had the chance. Does that make sense? This attributed aggressiveness is a social tactic to shut anyone down who "speaks out of turn".
- and of course: a black transfemme gets targetted by anti-Black racists, which is more severe than if they had targetted the average cis or hetero person, many of whom have more of a support network -> queer lack of support network, compounded with anti-black bigotry
An issue like housing may affect black transfemmes more than most people, but as long as we demand a minimum standard in housing for everyone, we are excluding no one. So transmisogynoir isn't strictly a necessary concept to tackle that.
And the targeting that occurred is a good example of how a specific fringe hate group (white supremacist bigots on the far right) picks victims who are queer because they are the black people who don't have as much support and ability to fight back.
To me at least, it seems that a lot of intersectional labels (from transmisogyny to lesbophobia to transmisogynoir) often obscure rather than clarify these causes. Everything becomes part of a mysterious intersection of discriminations with fluid effects that mysteriously cross-pollinate and nobody can figure out the next steps in their own liberation except to say which group they would like to see protected.
What's perhaps most interesting in the essay are the "allies" that kick the author out of her community spaces. The management people that repeat transphobic accusations like "you tower over them" with zero self-awareness. Or ask to "put yourself in the shoes of a traumatized person"...I can't decide if that's a consciously bigoted remark to erase the author's history with trauma on purpose or if it's a unconscious and uncaring attitude, treating people as non-traumatized by default ("I mean you are chatting with me right now. The trauma can't be too bad."). Either way, it's horrific.
Hopefully people can pick apart what went wrong here and learn lessons from each example given. With reflection and dedication, this kind of exclusion won't repeat itself.