@fanslyath31 would you like to join the conversation we've been having about coordinated harassment rings? We always love hearing from the people that ringleaders incite

feminists with coordinated rings? feminists?? coordination?? there's no way lmao you really are like an anti-sjw

so, obviously she did not attempt to learn ANYTHING about me before setting in to try to hurt me. one click of my blog would have given her the context necessary to understand what I was really doing here, but she didn't do that.

all they ever need is a cue from a ringleader. they do not need to understand anything about their target, just that there is an available acceptable target.

I don't think I really need to address how this does absolutely nothing to advance the cause of womens' liberation, the TERFs are a lot more blatant about it. Because they're not trying to be socially conscious in the first place, they don't bother, they just do baldfaced stochastic violence.

but, in the end, the pattern of behavior is the same. ex-tgirl is the ringleader, she cultivates prestige that she then lends out to the wider group by designating acceptable targets with which they can reify their status as a member of the ingroup.

this is the ecosystem of hatred, the only difference is who they feel is an acceptable target and why.

"acceptable targets" hahah, you mean like all women in the inexorable path of transgenderism? you mean the ones where the MAJORITY does NOT want transgenderites in their sex protected spaces? dont talk to me about "acceptable targets" when YOUR entire movement is built on ignoring intersex people, homosexual people, detransers, desisters, women and children?

this has nothing to do with ex-tgirl btw. i love that guy and i love all the other TERFs as well. i love them and i am fully willing to back any of them up!! this isnt a centralized movement and you just sound silly saying that.

and what do YOU propone to advance women's liberation? stay silent and let the frontrunners for taking away women's rights and regressing societal advances taken by feminism (ie: sex based protections)? 'cause im not gonna shut up until something happens even if it takes foreva because its our DUTY to make it better for those who come forwards and in the future there's no space for idealistic religions.

also, i did lurk your blog for a bit i just saw that your "epic sjw pwns" are pretty much nonsensical and look more like inside jokes than actual debunks so you obviously had nothing of worth to say that any other male rights activist hasnt said before

you talk like a cartoon. "epic sjw pwn" you gotta be in your 30s to be talking like this. and this is what you spend your time on?

I'm advocating for victims of CSA. that's the conversation you're stumbling into. it's literally my pinned post, you didn't read it cuz you were not interested in anything but trying to get a little dig in at me.

how's that going for you? does it feel like it's going well?

you know i was really excited at first to see someone who wouldnt fold after one comment (congratulations, you folded at two) but thank you for only being ableist instead of racist this time like your buddies <3 and for the record im not 30, i just know my history

"my history" is so fucking funny. that's the level that these people engage with feminism on. literally just tumblr.

this is what is meant by "unserious person"

note the complete and total willingness to just skate on by the CSA thing. they're not interested in helping people, they're just here for an acceptable target on which to vent their frustrations.

this is a systemic issue, people do not do this if they are happy and fulfilled, everyone is a victim here.

skate on the "csa" thing? what? this is the first time you've brought this up (i checked the posts about you seething with ex-tgirl and his wife and i didnt really find evidence of anything? please, elaborate) and also "this is a systemic issue" who set that system up? who's the root problem of all the issues that i brought up and you just discarded with a cute little quip about how autistic people sound like cartoons? i know you're itching to show yourself as the unbothered good guy like so many of your alt-right beliefs indicate (see: the opressor can make a better replacement of the opressed) but you gotta give me something to work with here (or you could just say something ableist again to end up looking like even more of a larper)

edit: no wait, i was wrong, you brought it up last message in less than one line of text, my bad my phone was running out of battery and i needed to reply fast ooops

(also, just tumblr? insane, most clear projection ever, i have actively posted about reading feminist books and feminist lit in my tbr LMAO)

OH NO NO NO, WAIT, WAIT WAIT. YOU'RE AN ISFF SUPPORTER?????? HAHAHHAHAH HOLY SHIT

why didnt you tell me earlier im wasting my fucking time here holy shit. oh my god. there's no winning with you people. "TERFs" dont run the fuckkkign anti-isff thing those transsexualites hate us just as much as they hate pedophiles. this statement is just as ridiculous as saying that "communists run the us goverment" ohhhh my god theres no way. fuck outta here with your "targeted harrassment rings" shit. take it from the horses mouth (me) i wish we had the actual leverage and GRU infiltration skills that you people say we have. its not true, i wish it was but its not. the ISFF thing was a result of how much transwomen fucking despise transmen for being AFAB and transitioning into transmen anyways, dont you point fingers at the boogeymen. this conversation is over i do not expect you to say anything worth my time even a little bit.

@fanslyath31 would you like to join the conversation we've been having about coordinated harassment rings? We always love hearing from the people that ringleaders incite

feminists with coordinated rings? feminists?? coordination?? there's no way lmao you really are like an anti-sjw

so, obviously she did not attempt to learn ANYTHING about me before setting in to try to hurt me. one click of my blog would have given her the context necessary to understand what I was really doing here, but she didn't do that.

all they ever need is a cue from a ringleader. they do not need to understand anything about their target, just that there is an available acceptable target.

I don't think I really need to address how this does absolutely nothing to advance the cause of womens' liberation, the TERFs are a lot more blatant about it. Because they're not trying to be socially conscious in the first place, they don't bother, they just do baldfaced stochastic violence.

but, in the end, the pattern of behavior is the same. ex-tgirl is the ringleader, she cultivates prestige that she then lends out to the wider group by designating acceptable targets with which they can reify their status as a member of the ingroup.

this is the ecosystem of hatred, the only difference is who they feel is an acceptable target and why.

"acceptable targets" hahah, you mean like all women in the inexorable path of transgenderism? you mean the ones where the MAJORITY does NOT want transgenderites in their sex protected spaces? dont talk to me about "acceptable targets" when YOUR entire movement is built on ignoring intersex people, homosexual people, detransers, desisters, women and children?

this has nothing to do with ex-tgirl btw. i love that guy and i love all the other TERFs as well. i love them and i am fully willing to back any of them up!! this isnt a centralized movement and you just sound silly saying that.

and what do YOU propone to advance women's liberation? stay silent and let the frontrunners for taking away women's rights and regressing societal advances taken by feminism (ie: sex based protections)? 'cause im not gonna shut up until something happens even if it takes foreva because its our DUTY to make it better for those who come forwards and in the future there's no space for idealistic religions.

also, i did lurk your blog for a bit i just saw that your "epic sjw pwns" are pretty much nonsensical and look more like inside jokes than actual debunks so you obviously had nothing of worth to say that any other male rights activist hasnt said before

you talk like a cartoon. "epic sjw pwn" you gotta be in your 30s to be talking like this. and this is what you spend your time on?

I'm advocating for victims of CSA. that's the conversation you're stumbling into. it's literally my pinned post, you didn't read it cuz you were not interested in anything but trying to get a little dig in at me.

how's that going for you? does it feel like it's going well?

you know i was really excited at first to see someone who wouldnt fold after one comment (congratulations, you folded at two) but thank you for only being ableist instead of racist this time like your buddies <3 and for the record im not 30, i just know my history

"my history" is so fucking funny. that's the level that these people engage with feminism on. literally just tumblr.

this is what is meant by "unserious person"

note the complete and total willingness to just skate on by the CSA thing. they're not interested in helping people, they're just here for an acceptable target on which to vent their frustrations.

this is a systemic issue, people do not do this if they are happy and fulfilled, everyone is a victim here.

skate on the "csa" thing? what? this is the first time you've brought this up (i checked the posts about you seething with ex-tgirl and his wife and i didnt really find evidence of anything? please, elaborate) and also "this is a systemic issue" who set that system up? who's the root problem of all the issues that i brought up and you just discarded with a cute little quip about how autistic people sound like cartoons? i know you're itching to show yourself as the unbothered good guy like so many of your alt-right beliefs indicate (see: the opressor can make a better replacement of the opressed) but you gotta give me something to work with here (or you could just say something ableist again to end up looking like even more of a larper)

edit: no wait, i was wrong, you brought it up last message in less than one line of text, my bad my phone was running out of battery and i needed to reply fast ooops

(also, just tumblr? insane, most clear projection ever, i have actively posted about reading feminist books and feminist lit in my tbr LMAO)

@fanslyath31 would you like to join the conversation we've been having about coordinated harassment rings? We always love hearing from the people that ringleaders incite

feminists with coordinated rings? feminists?? coordination?? there's no way lmao you really are like an anti-sjw

so, obviously she did not attempt to learn ANYTHING about me before setting in to try to hurt me. one click of my blog would have given her the context necessary to understand what I was really doing here, but she didn't do that.

all they ever need is a cue from a ringleader. they do not need to understand anything about their target, just that there is an available acceptable target.

I don't think I really need to address how this does absolutely nothing to advance the cause of womens' liberation, the TERFs are a lot more blatant about it. Because they're not trying to be socially conscious in the first place, they don't bother, they just do baldfaced stochastic violence.

but, in the end, the pattern of behavior is the same. ex-tgirl is the ringleader, she cultivates prestige that she then lends out to the wider group by designating acceptable targets with which they can reify their status as a member of the ingroup.

this is the ecosystem of hatred, the only difference is who they feel is an acceptable target and why.

"acceptable targets" hahah, you mean like all women in the inexorable path of transgenderism? you mean the ones where the MAJORITY does NOT want transgenderites in their sex protected spaces? dont talk to me about "acceptable targets" when YOUR entire movement is built on ignoring intersex people, homosexual people, detransers, desisters, women and children?

this has nothing to do with ex-tgirl btw. i love that guy and i love all the other TERFs as well. i love them and i am fully willing to back any of them up!! this isnt a centralized movement and you just sound silly saying that.

and what do YOU propone to advance women's liberation? stay silent and let the frontrunners for taking away women's rights and regressing societal advances taken by feminism (ie: sex based protections)? 'cause im not gonna shut up until something happens even if it takes foreva because its our DUTY to make it better for those who come forwards and in the future there's no space for idealistic religions.

also, i did lurk your blog for a bit i just saw that your "epic sjw pwns" are pretty much nonsensical and look more like inside jokes than actual debunks so you obviously had nothing of worth to say that any other male rights activist hasnt said before

you talk like a cartoon. "epic sjw pwn" you gotta be in your 30s to be talking like this. and this is what you spend your time on?

I'm advocating for victims of CSA. that's the conversation you're stumbling into. it's literally my pinned post, you didn't read it cuz you were not interested in anything but trying to get a little dig in at me.

how's that going for you? does it feel like it's going well?

you know i was really excited at first to see someone who wouldnt fold after one comment (congratulations, you folded at two) but thank you for only being ableist instead of racist this time like your buddies <3 and for the record im not 30, i just know my history

@fanslyath31 would you like to join the conversation we've been having about coordinated harassment rings? We always love hearing from the people that ringleaders incite

feminists with coordinated rings? feminists?? coordination?? there's no way lmao you really are like an anti-sjw

so, obviously she did not attempt to learn ANYTHING about me before setting in to try to hurt me. one click of my blog would have given her the context necessary to understand what I was really doing here, but she didn't do that.

all they ever need is a cue from a ringleader. they do not need to understand anything about their target, just that there is an available acceptable target.

I don't think I really need to address how this does absolutely nothing to advance the cause of womens' liberation, the TERFs are a lot more blatant about it. Because they're not trying to be socially conscious in the first place, they don't bother, they just do baldfaced stochastic violence.

but, in the end, the pattern of behavior is the same. ex-tgirl is the ringleader, she cultivates prestige that she then lends out to the wider group by designating acceptable targets with which they can reify their status as a member of the ingroup.

this is the ecosystem of hatred, the only difference is who they feel is an acceptable target and why.

"acceptable targets" hahah, you mean like all women in the inexorable path of transgenderism? you mean the ones where the MAJORITY does NOT want transgenderites in their sex protected spaces? dont talk to me about "acceptable targets" when YOUR entire movement is built on ignoring intersex people, homosexual people, detransers, desisters, women and children?

this has nothing to do with ex-tgirl btw. i love that guy and i love all the other TERFs as well. i love them and i am fully willing to back any of them up!! this isnt a centralized movement and you just sound silly saying that.

and what do YOU propone to advance women's liberation? stay silent and let the frontrunners for taking away women's rights and regressing societal advances taken by feminism (ie: sex based protections)? 'cause im not gonna shut up until something happens even if it takes foreva because its our DUTY to make it better for those who come forwards and in the future there's no space for idealistic religions.

also, i did lurk your blog for a bit i just saw that your "epic sjw pwns" are pretty much nonsensical and look more like inside jokes than actual debunks so you obviously had nothing of worth to say that any other male rights activist hasnt said before

@fanslyath31 would you like to join the conversation we've been having about coordinated harassment rings? We always love hearing from the people that ringleaders incite

feminists with coordinated rings? feminists?? coordination?? there's no way lmao you really are like an anti-sjw

so, obviously she did not attempt to learn ANYTHING about me before setting in to try to hurt me. one click of my blog would have given her the context necessary to understand what I was really doing here, but she didn't do that.

all they ever need is a cue from a ringleader. they do not need to understand anything about their target, just that there is an available acceptable target.

I don't think I really need to address how this does absolutely nothing to advance the cause of womens' liberation, the TERFs are a lot more blatant about it. Because they're not trying to be socially conscious in the first place, they don't bother, they just do baldfaced stochastic violence.

but, in the end, the pattern of behavior is the same. ex-tgirl is the ringleader, she cultivates prestige that she then lends out to the wider group by designating acceptable targets with which they can reify their status as a member of the ingroup.

this is the ecosystem of hatred, the only difference is who they feel is an acceptable target and why.

"acceptable targets" hahah, you mean like all women in the inexorable path of transgenderism? you mean the ones where the MAJORITY does NOT want transgenderites in their sex protected spaces? dont talk to me about "acceptable targets" when YOUR entire movement is built on ignoring intersex people, homosexual people, detransers, desisters, women and children?

this has nothing to do with ex-tgirl btw. i love that guy and i love all the other TERFs as well. i love them and i am fully willing to back any of them up!! this isnt a centralized movement and you just sound silly saying that.

and what do YOU propone to advance women's liberation? stay silent and let the frontrunners for taking away women's rights and regressing societal advances taken by feminism (ie: sex based protections)? 'cause im not gonna shut up until something happens even if it takes foreva because its our DUTY to make it better for those who come forwards and in the future there's no space for idealistic religions.

@fanslyath31 would you like to join the conversation we've been having about coordinated harassment rings? We always love hearing from the people that ringleaders incite

feminists with coordinated rings? feminists?? coordination?? there's no way lmao you really are like an anti-sjw

so has any human being who isn’t an MRA or a troll or a terf in disguise actually used the term ‘cotton ceiling’ or

I’m an MRA and I’ve never heard that term before. What is it supposed to mean?

it means nobody likes you go away

Gonna assume it’s not something I’d ever say then.

Cotton ceiling is the tendency of trans women to be excluded from the higher echelons of (cis-dominated) women’s and queer spaces — specifically within the porn industry, but also society in general. It is a manifestation of transmisogyny at the intersection of cissexism, misogyny, and the glass ceiling

I mean I don’t use it, and I don’t really understand it etymologically, and I think it’s couched in a lot of fancy language which means a lot less than it says, but… I don’t see what’s wrong with it, either…

You don’t see what’s wrong with women’s underwear being called a barrier to be broken through?

the underwear being referred to ISNT the cis women’s; it’s the trans woman’s (or fat, disabled, nonwhite, etc. woman- the cotton ceiling often refers to radicalized bodies in general). the implication is that what is in the trans woman’s pants is excluding her from spaces and connections, and it’s something she needs to overcome. transphobes twisted the language the other way to demonize trans women.

Dude, I was around for the Cotton Ceiling Conference.

Like, literally irl around. It was hosted nearby, even, and I spoke with Morgan Page, one of the people presenting it.

It distinctly referred to the underwear of lesbians who refused to find trans women sexually attractive.

But hey, don’t take my word for it! Let’s hear from Avory Faucette, a trans activist involved with the Cotton Ceiling:

[T]he cotton ceiling [is] us[ed] to challenge cis lesbians’ tendency to support trans causes generally but draw the line at sleeping with trans women or including trans lesbians in their sexual communities.

Drew Deveaux, the originator of the term, is even more specific:

“The cotton ceiling is a theory proposed [by trans porn star and activist Drew DeVeaux] to explain the experiences queer trans women have with simultaneous social inclusion and sexual exclusion within the broader queer women’s communities. Basically, it means that cis queer women will be friends with us and talk day and night about trans rights and ending transmisogyny, but will still not consider us viable sexual partners.

The term cotton ceiling is a reference to the “glass ceiling” that second wave feminist identified in the workforce, wherein women could only advance so high in the workforce but could not break through into positions of power and authority. The cotton represents underwear, signifying sex.”

So right there from the horses’ mouth–

The cotton ceiling represents underwear, signifying sex, and the underwear in question refers specifically to lesbians’

Please, don’t try to retcon history to someone who watched it go down.

They are trying to backtrack and rewrite their own disgusting misogynist terms to make them more palatable to the masses. Nope. The cotton ceiling is most definitely rape culture rhetoric. Anyone who says otherwise is flat out lying because they know how disgusting it makes them look.

“Sexual exclusion”. What a rape-y thing to call women’s natural boundaries.

^ From the horses mouth (again)

^ “Breaking sexual barriers” (implying that the “cotton” part of “cotton ceiling” = women’s underwear to be “broken” through, as one would wish to “break” through a glass ceiling)

^ Even from a pro-trans perspective this sounds entitled and rape-y as shit!! More examples here and receipts of trans people using the term unironically here.

lmao look at them trying to redefine the word

Of course they are. They got called out for what it is and now it has to be the terf’s fault somehow. 

It’s kind of crazy how people demand that impcore military pigs be coddled into not being part of a genocidal murder machine. They should actually get repeatedly beaten over the head with the reality of the institution they are a part of until they defect or die about it. There shouldn’t be a single second of their lives where they aren’t reminded of what they serve and the blood that is on their hands. Even if they “already know.”

If you're in the US military or National Guard, frag yourself+your entire unit immediately and pray that that is enough penance for the horrors you have facilitated/visited upon the world in the name of imperialism and that you won’t go straight to hell when you bite it.

Liberals love to talk as if members of the US military are an oppressed class.

it should actually get beaten over the head with anything physical until it understands its role as opressing, murderers, and give it the choice between rebelling against its instincts or be put down like the rabid dog it is. if you're in the us millitary the best thing you can do is shoot any other mongrel you see and hope that you'll only get shot instead of tortured to death like many of the ones it sentenced.

critically examine your genital preference but don't examine why that grown man has a preference for diapers. unpack your transphobic aversion to bodies with diverse genitalia but don't ask someone to unpack their hatred of their own genitals. seek therapy to get over your so-called "exclusive same-sex attraction" but suggesting counseling for people who think they were born in the wrong body is conversion therapy. asserting that homosexuality is not socially deviant is homonormativity but purchasing your gender identity from the fashion and medical industries is punk. your genital preference was learned but their gender identity is biological. your genital preference is shameful but don't you dare kink shame.

their "sex positivity" is only relevant when supporting the opressors, the abusive, and the right to keep exploiting the meek; only as a reaction to the liberation of them

"It makes you worse than a bystander. A bystander does nothing. [...] You step into the fray just to prod the victim for the imprecision of their screams."

This is so laughable. The only misogyny TIMs experience is if they're mistaken for women.

I wish it was true that transcrotes were "[men] everyone is allowed to abuse" because I'd love it if transcrote sex pests were actually removed from social spaces. I wish trans identified misogynists were run off this site BEFORE they say they're pedophiles. I wish yall were "abusable" because yall aren't "abused" when you're bigots, misogynists and predators. You're protected when you abuse vulnerable women. I hope they all go to hell.

The swing back to woke needs to be so bad that identifying as a "trans woman" has you labeled a facist and blacklisted everywhere.

absolutely. they aren't the ""women of women"" they are the men of men. untouchable, inexorable, excempt from accountability. everyone owes them everything and they owe nothing to anyone. it is easy to fall into majoritarian worldviews when you already believe you make a better replacement to the opressed who are angry and in pain for far longer than you. that's why so many tran$genderite$ are white supremacists