Pinned
What is "anarcho-Zionist"?
We've had people ask us this a number of times. We're basically just gonna copy an old Reddit comment of ours from when someone else asked this question, as it pretty well sums up our position:
"Essentially, I believe that Zionism - the establishment and maintenance of Jewish sovereignty in our ancient homeland - and Anarchism - non-hierarchical societal organization - are compatible ideologies. Indeed, it seems to me that a Jewish state, although it theoretically makes us safer, has its own ways of endangering us. Jews in Israel may not be persecuted for being Jewish, but they are no less vulnerable to the exploitation inherent in the coercive (violent) nature of the state. This is not even accounting for the way the Israeli state dominates over the Palestinians, thus provoking them into outright anti-Zionism and hatred, thus endangering the Jews of Israel. All this taken into consideration, it is my view that Anarchism is the best interpretation of how to exert Zionism.
In practical terms, I basically think that both Israel and Palestine (as states) should be abolished and replaced with either a decentralized Kibbutzim federation, or straight up just a copy paste of Rojava's Democratic Confederalism. Either way, I would have both Jews and Arabs having local autonomy in collectivized, non-hierarchical society. Basically a canton system. As long as Arabs are unable to dominate over Jews, Jews will have a homeland in Eretz Y'Israel. I think the best way to accomplish this is through Anarchist principles. Thus, Anarcho-Zionism."
In a more straight forward sense, the fact is that most Anarchists believe in some form of Indigenous landback, so honestly, Anarchist style Indigenous landback but for the Jewish people is not exactly a difficult concept for us to hold.
Worth note as well that we provisionally believe in a two-state solution. It's kinda hard to do Anarchist organizing when the groups involved friggin hate each other. They need to learn to live together without killing each other for at least a few generations. Only after that do we think that abolishing the involved states would make any practical sense.









