Avatar

Strange things around here

@forest-loving-fae

I straight up reblog stuff here. 💖 Usually. sometimes I come up with my own stuff. but if you really want to see some of my art and my writing that would be my other blog the-hero-unknown she/her

I don’t mean to be rude; but I don’t think I’ve ever seen this, does anyone have any examples?

Avatar
darkshrimpemotions
  • Supernatural
  • Doctor Who (Steven Moffat specifically)
  • Sherlock (Steven Moffat specifically)
  • Actually Steven Moffat is basically just this sentiment given human form.
  • A version of this happened with The Magicians, tbh. Though instead of expectation: men, reality: women it was expectation: smug nihilists, reality: mentally ill queer folks.
  • Arguably Game of Thrones.

If we broaden it outside of television…I think Star Wars falls into this, at least the sequel trilogy. Maybe the MCU as well. And I can’t help but think of every band that’s ever complained that their fanbase is mostly women. 5 Seconds of Summer comes immediately to mind.

In general, most white male creators seem to have this massively entitled mindset where they want–and think they deserve–the time, attention, and enthusiasm that creative fandom (i.e. the side of fandom more dominated by women) is known for.

They want our eyes for ratings, our word-of-mouth for free publicity, our metas for social media buzz, and our spending power for merch and cons. But they don’t want us. And they don’t really want the responsibility of telling a story to a thoughtful, engaged audience, regardless of that audience’s demographic makeup. They just want to be praised for whatever schlock they cough up.

And like any other spoiled brat, they will break their toys before they share them.

It goes all the way to the top for kids shows. Toy sales will crash a show. Makes sense, but if those toys are gendered for boys instead of the female viewers, they won’t usually switch up the marketing and move them to the girl aisle. They cancel the show outright.

Mind you it is perfectly possible to make the switch in marketing, but execs would rather throw it all out than have something that doesn’t perform well with male viewers. For example the Rey merch was not expected to be popular, for some reason, there had to be public outcry to get merch of one of the main 3 protagonists. A PROTAGONIST. The fact that she wasn’t a huge part of the 1st launch says a lot already.

And what happened when female fans got too invested in the Sequel Trilogy? The entire writers room didn’t necessarily lash out, but they sure forgot how to behave.

#WhereIsRey (initial)

#WhereIsRey (ongoing)

You’re all sitting on the hot take of the decade tbh

And yet when they fond out that boys were watching MLP:FIM in droves, they had NO PROBLEM with it.

The 100 too. I’ll never forget how Jason Rothenberg would attacked female fans on Twitter and mock them in interviews, and then post links to male fan discussions on Reddit to praise and thank them. In his goodbye letter to the show he SPECIFICALLY thanked Reddit and it was so disgusting.

Star Trek from TNG on was also a boy’s club, even though the TOS fans were mostly women. Women, in fact, who literally created modern fandom with their zines. But after TNG it was all, “Women don’t understand Star Trek, only smart men hur dur.”

I think it would be harder for us to find examples of when this DIDNT happen than when it did. It happens all the time.

Doesn’t stop it from boggling the mind

(though it could probably start to make some sense if you follow the money past audience bases to maybe a couple of investors or like a rich patron … 🤔)

Stooooop I just wrote a masters thesis on this shit. Media creation and distribution is a means by which dominant power structures consolidate their hegemony. Dominantly situated creators get upset when the audience they attract isn’t the audience they wanted, because they view the whole creation and sharing of the fiction as an exercise to sustain kyriarchal conditions that benefit themselves. When the audience is Other, they see it as a failure of those efforts and lash out.

Simply, they’re trying to assert a particular worldview via fiction, and upon getting confronted with something else, begin foot stamping. It’s not just men wanting male attention and gatekeeping. It’s that the fiction in the first place was an attempt to curate dominance and whoopsie! they miscalculated.

(anyway if anyone wants to read 35k words of philosophy about this, hmu)

I think a lot about an interview I heard with Bo Burnham a few years ago, where he talks about this phenomenon with his own work. He gained a large audience of teenage girls, and people in comedy spaces would look down on him for that or say what a shame it was, but he responded differently:

“The real truth is, I would perform my show and I would meet kids after and young girls would come up to me and they understood what I was expressing in that bit onstage way more than guys my own age. Way more. So if there was a bridge between us that I had to cross to write the movie [Eighth Grade], it was built to me by them. I felt understood by them before I presumed to understand them.”

Instead of trying to change his comedy, he decided to lean into and celebrate the audience that he actually had by making a movie specifically about the experiences of a teenage girl. It’s fascinating to hear him talk about how he got there, but also to acknowledge how rare that reaction is.

Slight tangent - all of this is true of the sports (and related entertainment) industry as well. Female fans drive so much of the event attendance, media hype, and revenue, but it’s still viewed as Just For Men.

tumblr users love reading. you literally stopped for this post just because it has words in it

this is one of my favorite bits about tumblr

the users seem to actually prefer text posts to anything else, and treat it as a chore to play a video especially with sound

Anonymous asked:

I recently came across your comment that if you had to make Auri again you wouldn't include a romance - at least not a straight one - and honestly I feel that so hard. Nexus users can be the worst sometimes, pushing heteronormativity onto an implicitly lesbian character developed by lesbians for lesbians.

I would say go for it. Let them complain. This is your mod - not theirs. Your comfort, not their fantasies. Be unapologetic, stand firm, stand up for LGBT representation an in era of evaporating LGBT rights.

I hear you anon. I was a lot younger when I wrote Auri, and I wanted to please everyone. Still fighting that impulse a bit - but that's on me, not the Nexus users. To change Auri's orientation from playersexual to gay now, after almost a decade, would be a cruel and petty thing to do. Straight gamers aren't bad people just because they want to romance Auri when a romance is made available to them. Perhaps this is a controversial opinion, but after all of these years of modding, I've come to a conclusion that a character kinda stops being your character once you release them into the wild. People will mod their games in a billion different ways. They'll change how the character looks and behaves to suit their own playstyle. As follower authors we just kinda have to accept that. That's why I would never recommend you make a beloved OC into a follower. If you want full control of how your character is used in other people's games, don't make a follower. Your wishes will not be respected and that's just how it is. Of course, representation is super important, but again, failing to do so from the beginning was my fault. I'm sorry.

Avatar

Reblog if an elf lives in your head rent free.

Like if they have roommates that are also elves.

This ban describes this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

And also a massive amount of very tame, very average, very middle of the road novels that happen to have one or two sex scenes in them. And an enormous amount of movies that happen to have one or two sex scenes in them. Sex and crossdressing are just. So fucking common in fiction. Imagine your grandma putting her shitty mass market paperback romance novel collection from the 80s and 90s on ebay and risking a 20-year-maximum prison sentence. Imagine getting a criminal record because you own Disney's Mulan on DVD.

"Oh but they won't actually come after you for Mulan or old romance novels they'll selectively use a law absurd enough to include those things to only punish the people they want an excuse to punish" yeah that's how laws always work and that's worse. That's way, way worse.

I mean we all know they're actually just giving that Overton window a good ole shove as hard as they can and they don't actually fucking care about getting this all enforced but I'm tired. Aren't you tired? And that sucks. It helps them to make everyone tired. Spaghetti at the wall strategy.

We should stop to infantilize adult spaces on the internet.

YouTube is not meant for children, YouTube kids is.

Not all video-games are for children, a child can play mario kart not GTA.

ALL online games with a free chat aren't safe for children, regardless if there's a filter or not.

Every kind of chat, especially if people can send media or link over it, is not safe for children.

Children aren't safe online.

Governments shouldn't have any word (apart from already illegal content) on what belongs on the internet and what doesn't, kids shouldn't be unsupervised on the internet anyways.

Censors of the media always start from porn, because it's the most indefensible kind of content, and when they start banning other kinds of content they can always say that you just want back porn.

It was never about porn.

They're censoring Spotify, Wikipedia, YouTube... all sites where a kid shouldn't be unsupervised anyway.

They don't care about protecting the kids.

Sorry for the long post, but it is important to know that censors on porn never stop on porn.

This is Trey Reed. A 21 year old college student.

He was found hanging from a tree on the Delta State University campus on September 15th at 7 A.M with the police suggesting it was a suicide. The problem with that is the student body, which has stated that he suffered from both arms and legs broken and suspecting it to be a lynching.

No major media outpost is talking about it. There are no flags hung at half mass for him. Hell, there's not even gonna be an investigation, and that not okay. Not to his family, not to his friends.

Don't let his death fly under the radar.

What we’ve gotta understand is that “the modern Internet is abolishing spaces for adults” and “the modern Internet is abolishing space for children” are compatible phenomena. Neither group is being favoured: the modern Internet is abolishing spaces for adults (i.e., because grown-up topics aren’t advertiser friendly) and the modern Internet is abolishing spaces for children (i.e., because online communities which consist principally of people who have no money are hard to sell things to). The Internet that contemporary corporate interests are trying to build isn’t a space for anyone – it’s the digital equivalent of an Ikea showroom.

Like, when I say that the greater part of contemporary social media is fundamentally hostile to human life, I’m not indulging in hyperbole or constructing an ironic metaphor. I mean that 100% literally.

"It's to protect the kids, it's all about protecting kids! We just want kids to be safe and not exposed to anything inappropriate!"

Well, if that's the case, you'd think you'd be doing something about the 34 states where child marriage is still legal, but it's been all crickets there, huh?

Y'all y'all

I better not see any "Bring back old Laurance😭" type of comments under any of the mermaid tales YouTube videos cause Aphmau has shown REPREATEDLY that if we can not behave she will take it away. Again, she made MCD Aarmau canon cause of the literal death threats she was getting over laurmau and garmau.

The majority of us are ADULTS now. Make sure to behave like one so we can keep getting new things of old characters. If you dislike something, be polite and patient about it. She's writing characters she hasn't truly touched in YEARS. Finding the green screen coat and odd/funny choice is one thing (I personally find it hilarious) but being unable to accept change isn't.

WE CANT HAVE OLD LAUR BACK, the only other option is none at all.

I’ve not seen mermaid tales to form an opinion on him but if you’re complaining that his old VA isn’t coming back, THERES REASONS FOR THAT. He can’t!!

So it’s this one or none. I fear.

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.