If you love Sara Tancredi (Prison Break) and you want reblog or like,this is the link my reblog character :)
thank you!

what is it abt bbc merlin that makes it. linger
ppl keep talking about unfulfilled potential but that's not it for me. it's something else.
#because it didn’t end. not really#the prophecy wasn’t fulfilled. there was no golden age.#arthur hasn’t returned and they’ve never truly stood side by side as honest equals.#the knights died without saying goodbye. everyone left without saying goodbye. everyone changed without saying goodbye.#there’s so many gaps and plot holes and inexplicable writing decisions but None of them compare to the massive fucking void of that finale.#merlin is at the lake. merlin is still at the lake.#merlin is Still At The Lake and the writers had the gall to look us in the eye and say ‘That is all. Go home.’#there are tragic stories and then there are unfinished stories and this one is unfinished#with tragedy there is a finality to it even if the story ‘continues’ without an audience. but this fucking show didnt finish#and no matter how many fan-made fix-it’s no matter how many headcanons no matter how much art and creativity we do#it will not change that the show is unfinished. the book never closed the curtain never dropped we are waiting at the lake
tags by @surreal-static
i am never going to fucking recover from these tags. fucking hell
Reblog to save a duck
Quack quack
It’s getting to be that time of year where more people are going outside to parks and stuff so i thought it would a good idea to reblog this again
Once I was feeding some ducks from a bag of birdseed I brought with me, and this woman next to me looked so confused and asked what I was feeding them
When I said it was birdseed she just went “oh- can they actually eat that? Is that safe?”
I didnt know how to respond like, at all, so I just pointed at the duck and said “bird”
She then had a look on her face like a new groove was just forcibly carved in her brain and said softly “oh my fucking god”
Today's Adventure is that I, after an unintentional 13-hour power nap,
Update:
Ok, so:
... further details in a bit I think the Vikings are here.
OK so.
...Always reblog the Epics. :)
my favorite coworker told me the scenario she thinks of to fall asleep is she stumbles upon a baby sheep and has to raise it and it grows up and she has to shear it and she says she envisions shearing it so carefully that she always falls asleep at that part
“the arts and sciences are completely separate fields that should be pitted against each other” the overlap of the arts and sciences make up our entire perceivable reality they r fucking on the couch
Art vs STEM is a lie created to stop us from turning on the real enemy: business and economics
Arts vs STEM is a lie, the computer that put us on the moon was a loom of woven wires, our space suits were made by hand sewing, we need chemistry to mix paint and we need biology to raise the sheep who make the wool we spin into yarn and crochet or knit or weave and the world is beautiful
Reblogging as a science enthusiast and an artist
I was listening to a podcast discussing the question of what to do if a library book isn't just objectionable but has dangerously wrong information- in this case, advice to feed your infant raw milk- and they were conflicted about it because they didn't want to pile on the book bans. As someone who is not yet a librarian but has done a bunch of research on how libraries work, here's my advice if any of you have a similar situation:
Libraries get rid of books all the time- it's the only way they can find room for new books- and the first books to go are outdated legal and medical textbooks, where incorrect information could get a person killed or arrested. So if you find dangerously incorrect medical information in a book, please tell a librarian! You don't have to petition for a book ban, just politely bring it to the attention of the reference librarian! If they decide you're right, they'll remove it, and if not, they'll keep it. It doesn't make you a member of Moms for Liberty if you alert them to something they missed when weeding.
(Librarians who see this, feel free to add on if there's more to it!)
Adding to this: if you find questionable or potentially dangerous content in a book, any book, and you bring it to the attention of a librarian, their job is then to check and make that call.
Librarians have to get a masters degree to do the job. They spend years studying to do it, and have to prove their dedication to the accuracy and availability of information before they ever get behind the desk.
If you think something sounds wrong or dangerous, that’s a good data point. Your librarian is going to follow up with research about the modern understanding of what you found, the historic relevance of the book it’s in, and what likely outcomes of that information being available are. Some old, outdated books are useless. Some are interesting or useful records of the ideas and understandings of a past people. Some are primary documents from people who were incorrect.
Book bans demand librarians take books off the shelves entirely because they were told to, no further thought. The people telling them to have, generally, no expertise to make that call. If you find something objectionable and bring it to a librarians attention, you’re letting them know there’s some work to be done.
This, yeah. If you bring the book to the attention of the person at the checkout desk--who, frequently, is not a librarian--they will probably give you a form to fill out. It will be called something like, "Materials challenge form," and it will be the same form that they give to the Moms for Liberty types. That's OK!
Just fill it out and write down, in detail, exactly what you object to. Put the page number, if you can, and be specific--not just, "this book has some bad advice about what to feed babies," but, "On page 72, it says that raw milks is good for babies. This is incorrect, and following this advice could lead to a baby getting sick or even dying."
The stereotypical materials challenge is a vague, ideologically-driven screed, where it's clear that the person making the challenge hasn't read the book, or even looked at it, and has no idea what it contains, apart from a few buzzwords. A challenge that is about a specific, checkable fact will be a breath of fresh air.
You aren't outraged that the library has books about feeding babies naturally; you're saying that a specific thing about this particular book makes it a poor choice. The library can look for another title with the same subject area (whole, natural foods for babies) and general perspective (it's in favor of them) but that covers the topic in a more responsible way, and you'll be happy. The Moms for Liberty, on the other hand, want libraries to either not cover the topic, or cover it from only one perspective.
I’ve probably said this before but having every good and service turn into a subscription model is one of the worst new developments of our era of capitalism. Like yeah, shit sucked before but it didn’t suck for 19.99 a month indefinitely. This some new shit.
Reblogging this again bc I can’t stop angrily thinking about how there should be laws in place so that when a company sells a product or service there is either a cap on how many years they can keep charging subscription for it or they have to name a price they decide the product is worth and either the buyer pays that upfront or by those weekly/monthly instalments. At least put laws in place on what legally qualifies as a subscription service.
To prove something to a friend, please
REBLOG IF YOU THINK ASEXUALS BELONG IN LGBTQ+ SPACES
LIKE IF YOU THINK ASEXUALS DON’T BELONG IN LGBTQ+ SPACES
:)
REBLOGGING SO HARD.
@chickiefoo I read this as “do asexuals belong in space” and got SO EXCITED to send it to you
Happiness Will Come To You.
when tho
When You Least Expect It. Probably Late March
reblog for happiness to come for you in late march!
