You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: readme.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ TGBoost is implemented in `Python 2.7`, use `Pandas.DataFrame` to store data, an
32
32
33
33
## Compared with XGBoost
34
34
35
-
It is a binary classification task, the dataset can be downlown from [here](), which has 40000 samples and each sample with 52 features, some feature has missing value. The dataset is splited into trainset and valset, and compare the performance of TGBoost and XGBoost.
35
+
It is a binary classification task, the dataset can be downlown from [here](http://pan.baidu.com/s/1c23gJkc), which has 40000 samples and each sample with 52 features, some feature has missing value. The dataset is splited into trainset and valset, and compare the performance of TGBoost and XGBoost.
36
36
37
37
As the following figure shows, TGBoost get its best result at iteration 56 with 0.201 error rate. XGBoost gets its best result at iteration 37 with 0.198 error rate. They are roughly the same! However, I must say TGBoost is very slow.
0 commit comments