You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: duplicate_indexes/readme.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Some notes:
19
19
20
20
* A primary key index will never be marked as a "duplicate."
21
21
22
-
*Check for indexes on Foreign Keys and referenced columns. For referenced columns, dropping the duplicate index is not usually a problem, but for Foreign Keys you may have a tradeoff between query performance _vs_ INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE performance.
22
+
*Review results for indexes on Foreign Keys and referenced columns. For referenced columns, dropping the duplicate index is not usually a problem, but for Foreign Keys you may have a tradeoff between query performance _vs_ INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE performance.
23
23
24
24
* Your statistics may show that the "duplicate" index is being used; this is normal and not an argument to keep the duplicate. Postgres should switch to using the encompassing index once the duplicate is gone.
0 commit comments