add correct resource to notification docs

[Floris272]

Fixes #689

Changes

• set notif resource to object.

the resource was set to objectrecord because its fetched from the viewset queryset within NotificationMixinBase.

This pr just sets it to object hardcoded. Another solution would be to completely override the mxinxbase so that resource can become:

resource = (  
            new_cls.notification_resource._meta.model_name  
            or new_cls.queryset.model._meta.model_name  
        )  

so that notification_resource can be defined on the viewset but it seemed a bit overkill.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.00%. Comparing base (a54a03d) to head (1b1900c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #696      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.96%   84.00%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         131      131              
  Lines        2488     2495       +7     
  Branches      198      199       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         2089     2096       +7     
  Misses        354      354              
  Partials       45       45              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	issue/689-notif-docs-incorrect
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

🚨 3 Alerts

Benchmark	Measure Units	View	Benchmark Result (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary (Limit %)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_filter_by_object_type	Latency milliseconds (ms)	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	139.63 ms (+15.64%) Baseline: 120.74 ms	126.78 ms (110.13%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_large_page_size_page_1	Latency milliseconds (ms)	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	271.45 ms (+7.26%) Baseline: 253.09 ms	265.74 ms (102.15%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_large_page_size_page_5	Latency milliseconds (ms)	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	273.57 ms (+7.55%) Baseline: 254.37 ms	267.09 ms (102.43%)

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	Benchmark Result milliseconds (ms) (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary milliseconds (ms) (Limit %)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_filter_by_object_type	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	139.63 ms (+15.64%) Baseline: 120.74 ms	126.78 ms (110.13%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_filter_one_result	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	21.89 ms (+4.80%) Baseline: 20.89 ms	21.93 ms (99.81%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_large_page_size_page_1	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	271.45 ms (+7.26%) Baseline: 253.09 ms	265.74 ms (102.15%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_large_page_size_page_5	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	273.57 ms (+7.55%) Baseline: 254.37 ms	267.09 ms (102.43%)
performance_test/tests/test_objects_list.py::test_objects_api_list_small_page_size_page_20	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	127.77 ms (+4.11%) Baseline: 122.72 ms	128.86 ms (99.15%)

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[stevenbal]

@Floris272 could you change the git issue in the commit message from OAF#188 to #689?