Merge pull request TheOdinProject#166 from AngryGolfer/main

thatblindgeye · web-flow · commit 38dc43bd04c8 · 2022-04-16T08:31:54.000-04:00
Easy Fix - css-exercises/foundation/06 cascade fix/solution/style.css -Typo and line wrap
diff --git a/foundations/06-cascade-fix/solution/solution.css b/foundations/06-cascade-fix/solution/solution.css
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ div.text {
   Another solution would be keeping it in its original place and just chaining selectors, giving this rule a higher specificity:
 
   p.small-para {
-    font-size: 12px;
+    font-size: 14px;
   }
 */
 
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ div.text {
     font-size: 14px;
   }
 
-  Then we added another selector to create a descendant combinator. If we only created a descendant combinator, the specificity would be tied with the div.text selector and it would come down to rule order, and if we only moved it the div.text selector would still have a higher specificity.
+  Then we added another selector to create a descendant combinator. If we only created a descendant combinator, the specificity would be tied with the
+  div.text selector and it would come down to rule order, and if we only moved it the div.text selector would still have a higher specificity.
   
   Another solution would be to keep the rule where it was and just replace the div selector with the .text selector:
 

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ div.text {`
`32`	`32`	`Another solution would be keeping it in its original place and just chaining selectors, giving this rule a higher specificity:`
`33`	`33`
`34`	`34`	`p.small-para {`
`35`		`- font-size: 12px;`
	`35`	`+ font-size: 14px;`
`36`	`36`	`}`
`37`	`37`	`*/`
`38`	`38`
`@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ div.text {`
`74`	`74`	`font-size: 14px;`
`75`	`75`	`}`
`76`	`76`
`77`		`- Then we added another selector to create a descendant combinator. If we only created a descendant combinator, the specificity would be tied with the div.text selector and it would come down to rule order, and if we only moved it the div.text selector would still have a higher specificity.`
	`77`	`+ Then we added another selector to create a descendant combinator. If we only created a descendant combinator, the specificity would be tied with the`
	`78`	`+ div.text selector and it would come down to rule order, and if we only moved it the div.text selector would still have a higher specificity.`
`78`	`79`
`79`	`80`	`Another solution would be to keep the rule where it was and just replace the div selector with the .text selector:`
`80`	`81`