The Incremental Sort had a couple issues, resulting in leaking memory
during rescans, possibly triggering OOM. The code had a couple of
related flaws:
1. During rescans, the sort states were reset but then also set to NULL
(despite the comment saying otherwise). ExecIncrementalSort then
sees NULL and initializes a new sort state, leaking the memory used
by the old one.
2. Initializing the sort state also automatically rebuilt the info about
presorted keys, leaking the already initialized info. presorted_keys
was also unnecessarily reset to NULL.
Patch by James Coleman, based on patches by Laurenz Albe and Tom Lane.
Backpatch to 13, where Incremental Sort was introduced.
Author: James Coleman, Laurenz Albe, Tom Lane
Reported-by: Laurenz Albe, Zu-Ming Jiang
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
b2bd02dff61af15e3526293e2771f874cf2a3be7.camel%40cybertec.at
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/
db03c582-086d-e7cd-d4a1-
3bc722f81765%40inf.ethz.ch
node->outerNodeDone = false;
node->n_fullsort_remaining = 0;
node->bound_Done = 0;
- node->presorted_keys = NULL;
node->execution_status = INCSORT_LOADFULLSORT;
* cause a leak.
*/
if (node->fullsort_state != NULL)
- {
tuplesort_reset(node->fullsort_state);
- node->fullsort_state = NULL;
- }
if (node->prefixsort_state != NULL)
- {
tuplesort_reset(node->prefixsort_state);
- node->prefixsort_state = NULL;
- }
/*
* If chgParam of subnode is not null, then the plan will be re-scanned by