Skip to content

Analyzer should support new optional parameters syntax #4289

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
gbracha opened this issue Jul 31, 2012 · 7 comments
Closed

Analyzer should support new optional parameters syntax #4289

gbracha opened this issue Jul 31, 2012 · 7 comments
Assignees
@scheglov
Labels
legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead.
Milestone
M1

Comments

@gbracha
Copy link
Contributor

gbracha commented Jul 31, 2012

Per issue #4288
@gbracha
Copy link
Contributor Author

gbracha commented Jul 31, 2012

Added Triaged label.

@bwilkerson
Copy link
Member

Added Waiting label.

@bwilkerson
Copy link
Member

Added Triaged label.

@bwilkerson
Copy link
Member

Set owner to @bwilkerson.

@bwilkerson
Copy link
Member

The new syntax is supported by the changes in http://codereview.chromium.org/10837286/.

Now we need to update the resolver to recognize the new semantics while still allowing the old.

Set owner to @scheglov.
Added Started label.

@scheglov
Copy link
Contributor

https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10828355

@scheglov
Copy link
Contributor

https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=10900

Added Fixed label.

@gbracha gbracha added Type-Defect legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Aug 17, 2012
@gbracha gbracha added this to the M1 milestone Aug 17, 2012
@gbracha gbracha mentioned this issue Jun 3, 2015
Closed
@pq pq mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2023
Closed
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@scheglov scheglov

Labels
legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
M1
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@scheglov @gbracha @bwilkerson