You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am previous user of lxml. Unfortunatelly parsing using lxml was much faster comparing to html. Maybe there are places to improve it via applying some solutions from lxml? The biggest drop is in creating Document from String, especially for big sites
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Recently a PR with some performance improvements has been merged. Can you check if the performance is now more comparable? If not, could you provide an example preferably with the benchmark harness for python as well that demonstrates the difference in speed so I can take a look into it?
I am previous user of
lxml
. Unfortunatelly parsing usinglxml
was much faster comparing tohtml
. Maybe there are places to improve it via applying some solutions fromlxml
? The biggest drop is in creatingDocument
fromString
, especially for big sitesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: