Skip to content

Please focus on stabilizing and consistency before adding more features #4148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
famschopman opened this issue Aug 27, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@famschopman
Copy link

famschopman commented Aug 27, 2019

This is a general observation that I want to share in hope of boosting the quality and adoptability of ML.net because I really think it has great potential.

In recent release I have seen various features being added while the basics are not there yet, e.g. not working correctly or operate in an inconsistent way. This becomes obvious once you go outside of the standard basic tutorials.

The breaking changes into ML.net concepts in its earlier stage also had a domino effect on documentation, examples and learning code available online that in many cases have not yet been adjusted to reflect the new situation, and in many case are not compatible anymore. So it is even more important to release features that operate correctly and consistently to build trust.

Simple example, explainability of the model is crucial when you want to build confidence with end users of the analysis. However a feature like PFI does not work if you load the model from disk (you could mitigate by persisting the PFI outcome separately for future consumption but again, it is a workaround). It also doesn't work in combination with AutoML.

Making sure these features are working from A-Z across the various ways of interacting with ML.Net is crucial. It would for sure allow for much faster adoption of ML.Net because right now because it prevents you from moving forward as everything still feels very fragile with loose ends. And that is a shame because the potential is huge.

@codemzs
Copy link
Member

codemzs commented Oct 17, 2019

@famschopman We are trying our best to increase the stability of the repo while also add new features, that being said this is an opensource project so please feel free to make it better. The PFI issue you are describing has already been fixed as part of #4262

@codemzs codemzs closed this as completed Oct 17, 2019
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 20, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants