-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
ESQL: use the correct upper limit for topN for mv_expand queries #101266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Pinging @elastic/es-ql (Team:QL) |
Pinging @elastic/elasticsearch-esql (:Query Languages/ES|QL) |
Pinging @elastic/es-analytics-geo (Team:Analytics) |
Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics) |
@costin should we still do this one? |
@astefan, this was about the @wchaparro , unless Andrei has any objections (or I misunderstood things), I believe this is stale and can be closed. |
Closing. Thanks @alex-spies |
Description
Following #100782 in certain scenarios the "default" limit used for the TopN at Lucene level is too broad. This should be aligned with the logic in the Analyzer.AddImplicitLimit rule.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: