Skip to content

ESQL: add support for partial results #111518

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
bpintea opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

ESQL: add support for partial results #111518

bpintea opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >enhancement Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo)

Comments

@bpintea
Copy link
Contributor

bpintea commented Aug 1, 2024

Description

Allow a query to not fail on a shard failure. Similar to _search'es allow_partial_search_results.

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) label Aug 1, 2024
@bpintea
Copy link
Contributor Author

bpintea commented Aug 1, 2024

Related: #103081

@getkub
Copy link

getkub commented Aug 1, 2024

Please note, this will be Sev1 or Sev2 incident for large Enterprise customers; as the SIEM rules/Analytics run using ESQL will entirely fail even if there is a small shard failure or during underlying host upgrades. allow_partial_search_results should be default behaviour in our view.

@luigidellaquila
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the off-line discussions, we are considering to set this option to true by default, making it consistent with other ES APIs.

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member

dnhatn commented Mar 4, 2025

Close this in favor of #122802, where we track the progress.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >enhancement Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants