Skip to content

Conversation

@lovelydinosaur
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the work in #3108 from @maxpeterson - Thank you!

Closes #1533.

Renders as:

image

maxpeterson and others added 4 commits July 3, 2015 12:27
This also adds support for mixing single and paired choices:
```
[
    ('poor', 'Poor quality'),
    'medium',
    ('good', 'Good quality'),
]
```
@lovelydinosaur
Copy link
Contributor Author

@maxpeterson - We could consider something like #3101 as a follow up to this. I chose not to push that in as part of this change as a consequence of it being unclear what behavior we'd want (or even if we do want that behavior). As you mentioned:

I am not certain what the behaviour should be

I think the bottom line might be that we wouldn't accept further complications to the already ad-hoc 'OPTIONS' behavior, however I'd be willing to consider a fresh ticket for it if you were so minded and wanted to discuss further.

lovelydinosaur added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2015
@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur merged commit 37b4d42 into master Aug 6, 2015
@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur deleted the maxpeterson-grouped-choices-fix branch August 6, 2015 12:01
@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur modified the milestone: 3.2.0 Release Aug 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants