We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
as originally discussed in #216 and now moved outside
I am a bit uncertain if the test rests on correct assumptions:
99 rfc = ("Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:13:11 +0000", 0) 100 iso = ("2005-04-07T22:13:11 -0200", 7200) 101 iso2 = ("2005-04-07 22:13:11 +0400", -14400) 102 iso3 = ("2005.04.07 22:13:11 -0000", 0) 103 alt = ("04/07/2005 22:13:11", 0) 104 alt2 = ("07.04.2005 22:13:11", 0) 105 veri_time = 1112904791 # the time this represents (Pdb) 106 for date, offset in (rfc, iso, iso2, iso3, alt, alt2): 107 -> assert_rval(parse_date(date), veri_time, offset)
while date says it was 20 not 22 hours at UTC
$> date -u --date='@1112904791' Thu Apr 7 20:13:11 UTC 2005
changing to 1112911991 (prev + 2 hours) doesn't resolve the problem though
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
4a47a9c
No branches or pull requests
as originally discussed in #216 and now moved outside
I am a bit uncertain if the test rests on correct assumptions:
while date says it was 20 not 22 hours at UTC
changing to 1112911991 (prev + 2 hours) doesn't resolve the problem though
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: