Googletest export

Move all docs into top-level docs/ directory

PiperOrigin-RevId: 350211277

Author: Abseil Team

googletest/docs/advanced.md renamed to docs/advanced.md

@@ -371,8 +371,8 @@ Verifies that `val1` is less than, or almost equal to, `val2`. You can replace
 
 ### Asserting Using gMock Matchers
 
-[gMock](../../googlemock) comes with
-[a library of matchers](../../googlemock/docs/cheat_sheet.md#MatcherList) for
+[gMock](gmock_index.md) comes with
+[a library of matchers](gmock_cheat_sheet.md#MatcherList) for
 validating arguments passed to mock objects. A gMock *matcher* is basically a
 predicate that knows how to describe itself. It can be used in these assertion
 macros:
@@ -396,13 +396,13 @@ using ::testing::StartsWith;
 ```
 
 Read this
-[recipe](../../googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#using-matchers-in-googletest-assertions)
+[recipe](gmock_cook_book.md#using-matchers-in-googletest-assertions)
 in the gMock Cookbook for more details.
 
 gMock has a rich set of matchers. You can do many things googletest cannot do
 alone with them. For a list of matchers gMock provides, read
-[this](../../googlemock/docs/cook_book.md##using-matchers). It's easy to write
-your [own matchers](../../googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#NewMatchers) too.
+[this](gmock_cook_book.md##using-matchers). It's easy to write
+your [own matchers](gmock_cook_book.md#NewMatchers) too.
 
 gMock is bundled with googletest, so you don't need to add any build dependency
 in order to take advantage of this. Just include `"gmock/gmock.h"`
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ and you're ready to go.
 you haven't.)
 
 You can use the gMock
-[string matchers](../../googlemock/docs/cheat_sheet.md#string-matchers) with
+[string matchers](gmock_cheat_sheet.md#string-matchers) with
 `EXPECT_THAT()` or `ASSERT_THAT()` to do more string comparison tricks
 (sub-string, prefix, suffix, regular expression, and etc). For example,
 
@@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ handlers registered with `pthread_atfork(3)`.
 
 Note: If you want to put a series of test assertions in a subroutine to check
 for a complex condition, consider using
-[a custom GMock matcher](../../googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#NewMatchers)
+[a custom GMock matcher](gmock_cook_book.md#NewMatchers)
 instead. This lets you provide a more readable error message in case of failure
 and avoid all of the issues described below.
 

googlemock/docs/community_created_documentation.md renamed to docs/community_created_documentation.md

@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ Example usage:
 To customize the default action for a particular method of a specific mock
 object, use `ON_CALL()`. `ON_CALL()` has a similar syntax to `EXPECT_CALL()`,
 but it is used for setting default behaviors (when you do not require that the
-mock method is called). See [here](cook_book.md#UseOnCall) for a more detailed
+mock method is called). See [here](gmock_cook_book.md#UseOnCall) for a more detailed
 discussion.
 
 ```cpp
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ You can make a matcher from one or more other matchers:
 | Matcher                 | Description                           |
 | :---------------------- | :------------------------------------ |
 | `MatcherCast<T>(m)`     | casts matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`. |
-| `SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` | [safely casts](cook_book.md#casting-matchers) matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`. |
+| `SafeMatcherCast<T>(m)` | [safely casts](gmock_cook_book.md#casting-matchers) matcher `m` to type `Matcher<T>`. |
 | `Truly(predicate)`      | `predicate(argument)` returns something considered by C++ to be true, where `predicate` is a function or functor. |
 <!-- mdformat on -->
 
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ class MockFunction<R(A1, ..., An)> {
 };
 ```
 
-See this [recipe](cook_book.md#using-check-points) for one application of it.
+See this [recipe](gmock_cook_book.md#using-check-points) for one application of it.
 
 ## Flags
 

googletest/docs/faq.md renamed to docs/faq.md

@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
 <!-- GOOGLETEST_CM0012 DO NOT DELETE -->
 
 You can find recipes for using gMock here. If you haven't yet, please read
-[the dummy guide](for_dummies.md) first to make sure you understand the basics.
+[the dummy guide](gmock_for_dummies.md) first to make sure you understand the
+basics.
 
 **Note:** gMock lives in the `testing` name space. For readability, it is
 recommended to write `using ::testing::Foo;` once in your file before using the
@@ -1141,11 +1142,11 @@ Hamcrest project, which adds `assertThat()` to JUnit.
 
 ### Using Predicates as Matchers
 
-gMock provides a [built-in set](cheat_sheet.md#MatcherList) of matchers. In case
-you find them lacking, you can use an arbitrary unary predicate function or
-functor as a matcher - as long as the predicate accepts a value of the type you
-want. You do this by wrapping the predicate inside the `Truly()` function, for
-example:
+gMock provides a [built-in set](gmock_cheat_sheet.md#MatcherList) of matchers.
+In case you find them lacking, you can use an arbitrary unary predicate function
+or functor as a matcher - as long as the predicate accepts a value of the type
+you want. You do this by wrapping the predicate inside the `Truly()` function,
+for example:
 
 ```cpp
 using ::testing::Truly;
@@ -1710,7 +1711,7 @@ the test should reflect our real intent, instead of being overly constraining.
 
 gMock allows you to impose an arbitrary DAG (directed acyclic graph) on the
 calls. One way to express the DAG is to use the
-[After](cheat_sheet.md#AfterClause) clause of `EXPECT_CALL`.
+[After](gmock_cheat_sheet.md#AfterClause) clause of `EXPECT_CALL`.
 
 Another way is via the `InSequence()` clause (not the same as the `InSequence`
 class), which we borrowed from jMock 2. It's less flexible than `After()`, but
@@ -3714,8 +3715,8 @@ A cardinality is used in `Times()` to tell gMock how many times you expect a
 call to occur. It doesn't have to be exact. For example, you can say
 `AtLeast(5)` or `Between(2, 4)`.
 
-If the [built-in set](cheat_sheet.md#CardinalityList) of cardinalities doesn't
-suit you, you are free to define your own by implementing the following
+If the [built-in set](gmock_cheat_sheet.md#CardinalityList) of cardinalities
+doesn't suit you, you are free to define your own by implementing the following
 interface (in namespace `testing`):
 
 ```cpp

googlemock/docs/cheat_sheet.md renamed to docs/gmock_cheat_sheet.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 ### When I call a method on my mock object, the method for the real object is invoked instead. What's the problem?
 
 In order for a method to be mocked, it must be *virtual*, unless you use the
-[high-perf dependency injection technique](cook_book.md#MockingNonVirtualMethods).
+[high-perf dependency injection technique](gmock_cook_book.md#MockingNonVirtualMethods).
 
 ### Can I mock a variadic function?
 
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ trace, you'll gain insights on why the expectations you set are not met.
 
 If you see the message "The mock function has no default action set, and its
 return type has no default value set.", then try
-[adding a default action](for_dummies.md#DefaultValue). Due to a known issue,
-unexpected calls on mocks without default actions don't print out a detailed
-comparison between the actual arguments and the expected arguments.
+[adding a default action](gmock_for_dummies.md#DefaultValue). Due to a known
+issue, unexpected calls on mocks without default actions don't print out a
+detailed comparison between the actual arguments and the expected arguments.
 
 ### My program crashed and `ScopedMockLog` spit out tons of messages. Is it a gMock bug?
 
@@ -388,8 +388,8 @@ doesn't say what the return value should be. You need `DoAll()` to chain a
 `SetArgPointee()` with a `Return()` that provides a value appropriate to the API
 being mocked.
 
-See this [recipe](cook_book.md#mocking-side-effects) for more details and an
-example.
+See this [recipe](gmock_cook_book.md#mocking-side-effects) for more details and
+an example.
 
 ### I have a huge mock class, and Microsoft Visual C++ runs out of memory when compiling it. What can I do?
 

googlemock/docs/cook_book.md renamed to docs/gmock_cook_book.md

@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ follow:
 
 *   Derive a class `MockTurtle` from `Turtle`.
 *   Take a *virtual* function of `Turtle` (while it's possible to
-    [mock non-virtual methods using templates](cook_book.md#MockingNonVirtualMethods),
+    [mock non-virtual methods using templates](gmock_cook_book.md#MockingNonVirtualMethods),
     it's much more involved).
 *   In the `public:` section of the child class, write `MOCK_METHOD();`
 *   Now comes the fun part: you take the function signature, cut-and-paste it
@@ -376,8 +376,8 @@ convenient way of saying "any value".
 In the above examples, `100` and `50` are also matchers; implicitly, they are
 the same as `Eq(100)` and `Eq(50)`, which specify that the argument must be
 equal (using `operator==`) to the matcher argument. There are many
-[built-in matchers](cheat_sheet.md#MatcherList) for common types (as well as
-[custom matchers](cook_book.md#NewMatchers)); for example:
+[built-in matchers](gmock_cheat_sheet.md#MatcherList) for common types (as well
+as [custom matchers](gmock_cook_book.md#NewMatchers)); for example:
 
 ```cpp
 using ::testing::Ge;
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo);
 This works for all non-overloaded methods; if a method is overloaded, you need
 to help gMock resolve which overload is expected by specifying the number of
 arguments and possibly also the
-[types of the arguments](cook_book.md#SelectOverload).
+[types of the arguments](gmock_cook_book.md#SelectOverload).
 
 ### Cardinalities: How Many Times Will It Be Called?
 
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ called.
 
 We've seen `AtLeast(n)` as an example of fuzzy cardinalities earlier. For the
 list of built-in cardinalities you can use, see
-[here](cheat_sheet.md#CardinalityList).
+[here](gmock_cheat_sheet.md#CardinalityList).
 
 The `Times()` clause can be omitted. **If you omit `Times()`, gMock will infer
 the cardinality for you.** The rules are easy to remember:
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ the *default* action for the function every time (unless, of course, you have a
 
 What can we do inside `WillOnce()` besides `Return()`? You can return a
 reference using `ReturnRef(*variable*)`, or invoke a pre-defined function, among
-[others](cook_book.md#using-actions).
+[others](gmock_cook_book.md#using-actions).
 
 **Important note:** The `EXPECT_CALL()` statement evaluates the action clause
 only once, even though the action may be performed many times. Therefore you
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ overloaded). This makes any calls to the method expected. This is not necessary
 for methods that are not mentioned at all (these are "uninteresting"), but is
 useful for methods that have some expectations, but for which other calls are
 ok. See
-[Understanding Uninteresting vs Unexpected Calls](cook_book.md#uninteresting-vs-unexpected).
+[Understanding Uninteresting vs Unexpected Calls](gmock_cook_book.md#uninteresting-vs-unexpected).
 
 ### Ordered vs Unordered Calls {#OrderedCalls}
 
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ order as written. If a call is made out-of-order, it will be an error.
 
 (What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of
 them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! The
-details can be found [here](cook_book.md#OrderedCalls).)
+details can be found [here](gmock_cook_book.md#OrderedCalls).)
 
 ### All Expectations Are Sticky (Unless Said Otherwise) {#StickyExpectations}
 
@@ -699,4 +699,4 @@ For example, in some tests we may not care about how many times `GetX()` and
 In gMock, if you are not interested in a method, just don't say anything about
 it. If a call to this method occurs, you'll see a warning in the test output,
 but it won't be a failure. This is called "naggy" behavior; to change, see
-[The Nice, the Strict, and the Naggy](cook_book.md#NiceStrictNaggy).
+[The Nice, the Strict, and the Naggy](gmock_cook_book.md#NiceStrictNaggy).

googlemock/docs/gmock_faq.md renamed to docs/gmock_faq.md

@@ -166,10 +166,11 @@ exp ::= simple_expression_in_Python_syntax
 
 ## Code
 
-You can find the source code of Pump in [scripts/pump.py](../scripts/pump.py).
-It is still very unpolished and lacks automated tests, although it has been
-successfully used many times. If you find a chance to use it in your project,
-please let us know what you think! We also welcome help on improving Pump.
+You can find the source code of Pump in
+[googlemock/scripts/pump.py](../googlemock/scripts/pump.py). It is still very
+unpolished and lacks automated tests, although it has been successfully used
+many times. If you find a chance to use it in your project, please let us know
+what you think! We also welcome help on improving Pump.
 
 ## Real Examples