Client type

[taiki1frsh]

Currently ts-codegen use SigningCosmWasmClient for the client instead of CosmWasmSigner?
CosmWasmSigner is just a wrapper of SigningCosmWasmClient in ts-relayer.
But, I think it's more useful.

One of the reasons to prefer CosmWasmSigner is that it contains senderAddress to include as an argument of the many methods which SigningCosmWasmClient has.

[pyramation]

does it make sense to make this an option? It could make sense to do one as a default but have an option to use the CosmWasmSigner.

pardon my naivety, but would there be a reason that some developers would want to use SigningCosmWasmClient over CosmWasmSigner ?

[taiki1frsh]

For less code? (by not making CosmWasmSigner over SigningCosmWasmClient.)
But, I don't see any productive reason to do so in the end.

[taiki1frsh]

@pyramation
Ethan said it's better to use type from the cosmjs for ts-codegen.
So I retrieve this and request the revision about SigningCosmWasmClient in Cosmjs repo.

[pyramation]

oh, so does this mean we can close this issue and it will be updated in cosmjs?

I think requiring a signer from cosmjs or cosmwasm feels more official than the relayer repo.

[taiki1frsh]

Yes, you can, please.

I think requiring a signer from cosmjs or cosmwasm feels more official than the relayer repo.

I also think so. hope it will be treated well there.