You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, our plain name fragments are restricted to the US-ASCII subset of the relevant XML plain name fragment syntax. Now that we support IRIs should we expand this as well? I believe the actual XML syntax we reference covers a wider set of unicode. And perhaps we wouldn't need to spell out the syntax in our spec if we use the XML syntax exactly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, our plain name fragments are restricted to the US-ASCII subset of the relevant XML plain name fragment syntax. Now that we support IRIs should we expand this as well? I believe the actual XML syntax we reference covers a wider set of unicode. And perhaps we wouldn't need to spell out the syntax in our spec if we use the XML syntax exactly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: