You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Standard Library, I'm sure, along with other packages, has many instances of "single-symbol modules". E.g. @std/assert/assert. An author of a single-symbol module would reasonably have function-level JSDocs, instead of module-level JSDocs, as the Standard Library does. This seems to cause a few issues, which I think should be addressed:
The Standard Library, I'm sure, along with other packages, has many instances of "single-symbol modules". E.g.
@std/assert/assert
. An author of a single-symbol module would reasonably have function-level JSDocs, instead of module-level JSDocs, as the Standard Library does. This seems to cause a few issues, which I think should be addressed:I tried addressing these issues with JSDocs in denoland/std#4431, but seems to be the wrong approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: