Skip to content

suggestion: filter by 100% score #287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
iuioiua opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

suggestion: filter by 100% score #287

iuioiua opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers search

Comments

@iuioiua
Copy link
Contributor

iuioiua commented Mar 15, 2024

It doesn't have to be a full score specifically, but rather some way to filter based on score. In another form we could also sort by score in another form. However, filtering would be more straightforward. Either way, this would make looking for high-quality packages easier.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in JSR Mar 15, 2024
@lucacasonato lucacasonato moved this from Needs Triage to Ready in JSR Apr 8, 2024
@lucacasonato
Copy link
Member

I suggest we add a scope:>$INT$ and scope:<$INT$ filter option that lets you filter the search by > and < than a certain score. As an extra bonus we could also do >= and <=.

@iuioiua
Copy link
Contributor Author

iuioiua commented Apr 8, 2024

I assume you mean score:>$INT$. The idea of just having a rich search syntax in general like that would be great. E.g. compat:node, etc. Redis' FT.SEARCH query syntax might be a source of inspiration.

@lucacasonato
Copy link
Member

Yeah, mistyped.

@mwmuni
Copy link

mwmuni commented Jan 14, 2025

Is this being considered?

@crowlKats
Copy link
Collaborator

@mwmuni yes, we still want to have this

@lucacasonato lucacasonato added the good first issue Good for newcomers label May 1, 2025
@lucacasonato
Copy link
Member

This involves making some changes in processFilter to handle parsing score in the query.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers search
Projects
Status: Ready
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants