Skip to content

Testing in standards: from idea to full interop #38

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
marcoscaceres opened this issue Oct 13, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Testing in standards: from idea to full interop #38

marcoscaceres opened this issue Oct 13, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor

Request for Mozilla Position on an Emerging Web Specification

Other information

Proposes to enhance the w3c work mode to more closely align with the WHATWG Work Mode. It would be a grass roots effort.

In particular, encourages more use of ".tentative" as a filename post-fix to identify things in Web Platform Tests on which implementers don't have agreement on.

This is part of a larger discussion we've been having with Google about what ends up in WPT (and https://wpt.fyi). For example, should "Web Share" tests be part of the WTP without having the ".tentative" post-fix? (please don't fixate on Web Share, on which we have not yet taken a position #27, I'm just using it as an example).

@annevk
Copy link
Contributor

annevk commented Oct 13, 2017

The WPT community, of which we are part, has already embraced tentative tests: web-platform-tests/wpt#7663.

@annevk
Copy link
Contributor

annevk commented Oct 13, 2017

Having said that, it's still a bit in a trial state, if it causes an undue burden of sorts that would need to be addressed.

@annevk
Copy link
Contributor

annevk commented Jun 24, 2019

I think we're largely supportive of this and there's not much negative side effects. It in fact has helped when we did decide to experiment with something. I'm going to close this though as there's not much to record here I think. Please reopen if you disagree.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants