You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Proposes to enhance the w3c work mode to more closely align with the WHATWG Work Mode. It would be a grass roots effort.
In particular, encourages more use of ".tentative" as a filename post-fix to identify things in Web Platform Tests on which implementers don't have agreement on.
This is part of a larger discussion we've been having with Google about what ends up in WPT (and https://wpt.fyi). For example, should "Web Share" tests be part of the WTP without having the ".tentative" post-fix? (please don't fixate on Web Share, on which we have not yet taken a position #27, I'm just using it as an example).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think we're largely supportive of this and there's not much negative side effects. It in fact has helped when we did decide to experiment with something. I'm going to close this though as there's not much to record here I think. Please reopen if you disagree.
Request for Mozilla Position on an Emerging Web Specification
Other information
Proposes to enhance the w3c work mode to more closely align with the WHATWG Work Mode. It would be a grass roots effort.
In particular, encourages more use of ".tentative" as a filename post-fix to identify things in Web Platform Tests on which implementers don't have agreement on.
This is part of a larger discussion we've been having with Google about what ends up in WPT (and https://wpt.fyi). For example, should "Web Share" tests be part of the WTP without having the ".tentative" post-fix? (please don't fixate on Web Share, on which we have not yet taken a position #27, I'm just using it as an example).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: