integrate with NISO Reproducibility standards

[alee]

landing page: https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-31-2021-badging

Actual document: https://groups.niso.org/higherlogic/ws/public/download/24810/RP-31-2021_Reproducibility_Badging_and_Definitions.pdf

[alee]

This is mostly an effort to establish consistent terminology and taxonomy for badging reproducible / reusable research. The current draft recommendations are:

1. Open Research Objects (ORO) - author-created digital objects including data and code have been permanently archived in a public repository that assigns a global identifier and has guarantees of persistence. If all relevant research objects are made available, ORO-A

2. Research Objects Reviewed (ROR) - all author-created digital objects including data and code have been reviewed according to the criteria provided by the badge issuer. Badge metadata should link to the award criteria. Mutually exclusive with the ORO badge.
   2.1 Results Reproduced (ROR-R) - additional steps were taken / facilitated by the badge issuer to regenerate computational results before publication using the author created research objects. Assumes that the research objects also passed review, ROR-R
   2.2 Results Replicated (RER) - an independent study, aimed at answering the same scientific question, has obtained consistent results leading to the same findings potentially using new artifacts or methods. Badge links to the persistent identifier for that secondary publication but awarded to the publisher of the original work being badged.

[cmbarton]

This seems like a good idea.