Skip to content

Minimal set of meta data to make models findable #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
kettner opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Minimal set of meta data to make models findable #91

kettner opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
OMF discussion an issue to be raised for community discussion standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards

Comments

@kettner
Copy link

kettner commented May 18, 2020

@MarcoAJanssen, @cmbarton. To consider in the wording: meta data can be needed on many levels (e.g. metadata to make it possible to couple models, vs. metadata to make a model findable through the internet).

On findable (earlier discussed during other workshops): there should be a minimal set of metadata / tags available so models can be findable by e.g. repositories.

@kettner kettner added the standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards label May 18, 2020
@alee
Copy link
Member

alee commented May 20, 2020

Some options that might be worth exploring:

  • codemeta structured json-ld embedded in versioned computational model landing pages and available in a computational model's git repository or download package. comses.net
  • coordinating to establish crosswalks or mappings to the MINT model catalog and metadata
  • extensions to codemeta / schema.org that include critical domain specific metadata that may be missing (need domain specialists to step in here!)

For an example of how the embedded structured data is interpreted by Google see https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/u/0/#url=comses.net%2Fcodebases%2F2222

(structured data testing tool being deprecated, new link is https://search.google.com/test/rich-results?id=bzUAA0W3oOr_9zWGZc5gfA)

@alee
Copy link
Member

alee commented Jun 8, 2020

Another resource that may be useful to include for repositories that wish to adopt schema.org for making their resources Findable:

https://github.com/ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org/blob/master/guides/GETTING-STARTED.md

@alee alee added the OMF discussion an issue to be raised for community discussion label Oct 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
OMF discussion an issue to be raised for community discussion standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants