DOC: rm excessive backtick #61839
Merged
DOC: rm excessive backtick #61839
+6
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mattwang44
changed the title
mroeschke
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2025
|
Thanks @mattwang44 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)only fix sphinx syntaxdoc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rstfile if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.I’m developing a new sphinx-lint rule to detect excessive backticks (PR), and it flagged some in the current document (this GitHub search link lists these occurences too).
This PR fixes detected cases.