Skip to content

Add license information to properties and guidance on licensing in documentation #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
SableRaf opened this issue Mar 31, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@SableRaf
Copy link
Contributor

Context

A lot of existing Processing libraries don’t have an explicit license, and we haven’t really pushed for using open-source licenses in the past.

Yet, third-party libraries are often where new features get tried out before they make it into core. For this to be possible, they need to be using a compatible license.

Specifically, it would be a good idea for us to recommend using the LGPL v2.1 license which Processign core uses. This makes it easier to eventually bring features into core.

Note: Using GPL can be problematic because, while you can use LGPL code in a GPL project, you can’t do it the other way around.

Other permissive licenses like MIT are also compatible, but they’re less aligned with the spirit of the project since they allow commercial use of your code without contributing improvements back to the community.

Suggestion

It would make sense to add license info to the library properties and include some basic guidance on licensing in the documentation.

@mingness
Copy link
Collaborator

mingness commented Apr 1, 2025

This idea sounds good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants