You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of Rails 6.1.0, rails new generates its own "spring-ified" binstubs:
bin/rake
bin/rails
bin/spring
These binstubs are different than the ones that spring itself recommends. If you run spring binstub --all you will get a different set of files.
Prior to Rails 6.1.0, rails new used to call spring binstub to generate the bin/spring binstub. But as of Rails commit 72d10e21, spring binstub has been removed and Rails has slightly diverged from the Spring recommendations. It now uses these binstub templates: bin/spring, bin/rake, bin/rails.
Should this repository be updated to match the official Rails recommendations?
Or alternatively, should the README be updated to make it clear that you should not run spring binstub --all for Rails 6.1 projects?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of Rails 6.1.0,
rails new
generates its own "spring-ified" binstubs:These binstubs are different than the ones that spring itself recommends. If you run
spring binstub --all
you will get a different set of files.Prior to Rails 6.1.0,
rails new
used to callspring binstub
to generate thebin/spring
binstub. But as of Rails commit 72d10e21,spring binstub
has been removed and Rails has slightly diverged from the Spring recommendations. It now uses these binstub templates: bin/spring, bin/rake, bin/rails.Should this repository be updated to match the official Rails recommendations?
Or alternatively, should the README be updated to make it clear that you should not run
spring binstub --all
for Rails 6.1 projects?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: